Skip to main content

Security report for 9292.nl

9292 · Transportation · Netherlands

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

9292.nl is a well-established Dutch public transport journey planning website founded in 2006. It offers comprehensive services including journey planning across multiple transport modes such as trains, buses, trams, metro, ferries, and shared transport options. The website targets a broad audience including daily commuters, students, travelers with disabilities, and international visitors. The platform is a leading service in the Netherlands for public transport information and ticketing. Technically, the website leverages modern web technologies including the Astro framework, Usercentrics for consent management, and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is mobile-optimized, fast-loading, and accessible, with a professional and consistent design. However, some security best practices such as enabling DNSSEC and publishing security headers could be improved. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and consent management effectively but lacks explicit security headers and a published vulnerability disclosure policy. No contact information for incident response or data protection officers is found, which could be enhanced to improve trust and compliance. The domain registration data is consistent with the business, indicating legitimacy. Overall, 9292.nl presents a strong digital presence with good technical maturity and business credibility but could improve privacy compliance and security transparency to further strengthen its posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching 9292.nl

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
70
Email security
55
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

9292.nl holds a strong market position as the primary public transport journey planner in the Netherlands. Its business model focuses on providing journey planning and e-ticketing services, catering to a wide range of users including students, travelers with disabilities, and international visitors. The company benefits from a mature domain and consistent branding. Partnerships with transport operators and integration with shared mobility services enhance its ecosystem. Revenue streams likely include service fees from ticket sales and partnerships. The website's content and navigation are tailored to ease of use and accessibility, supporting growth and user retention.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enforced and consent management implemented via Usercentrics. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security.txt, explicit security headers (such as CSP, HSTS), and incident response contact information indicates room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The lack of a published privacy policy and terms of service reduces compliance maturity. Overall, the security culture appears functional but could benefit from enhanced transparency and technical controls to meet higher compliance standards like GDPR and NIS2.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the website footer.
  3. Implement and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures and incident reporting.
  4. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Provide clear contact information for data protection officers and incident response teams to enhance trust and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
9292
Description
9292 provides public transport journey planning and ticketing services in the Netherlands, including trains, buses, trams, metro, ferries, and shared transport options.
Key services
Public transport journey planner, E-ticket sales, Real-time travel information, Accessibility travel options, Shared transport information
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Astro framework, Usercentrics CMP, Google Tag Manager, Privacy Proxy, Responsive design, SVG graphics
Frameworks
Astro
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Consent management via Usercentrics
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
PubMatic
Tracking pixels
Usercentrics
Marketing tools
Usercentrics CMP
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Content is comprehensive for public transport users in the Netherlands.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  4. Cookie consent is managed via Usercentrics with visible scripts.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks (Astro).
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy detected.
  8. No explicit security headers detected in the provided data.
  9. Domain is mature and consistent with business operations.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the Astro framework, leveraging modern JavaScript modules and responsive design techniques. It integrates Usercentrics for cookie consent and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site uses SVG graphics for logos and icons, ensuring scalability and performance. The HTML structure is semantic and accessible, with ARIA roles and labels present in forms. Performance appears optimized with lazy loading of images and asynchronous script loading. No CMS is detected, indicating a custom or static site generation approach. Hosting provider details are not explicit in the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a fast, mobile-friendly, and user-centric experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with 9292.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review 9292.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.