Skip to main content

Security report for 4fstore.lv

Retail · Latvia

Partial score · DNS & email only

53/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

4Fstore.lv is an e-commerce retail website focused on selling sportswear and related products, primarily targeting customers in Latvia. The site is built using modern technologies including Magento PWA Studio and integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing purposes. The website demonstrates basic content quality and mobile optimization but lacks visible privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, as well as explicit contact information. Security posture is moderate with no detected WAF or blocking mechanisms, but no security headers or SSL details were available for analysis. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the site appears to be a legitimate regional online retailer but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching 4fstore.lv

This scan found 17 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
53

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention 4fstore.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
241
Employees
0
Customers
241
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
8%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for 4fstore.lv.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the retail and e-commerce sector, focusing on sportswear products. Its market position is likely regional within Latvia, serving general consumers interested in sports apparel. The business model is direct online retail, leveraging a modern PWA platform for user experience. The use of Google Tag Manager indicates active marketing and analytics efforts. Lack of visible trust indicators such as certifications or detailed company information suggests room for improvement in business credibility and transparency. No related or partner domains were identified from the content.

Security posture

The website shows a moderate security posture with HTTPS implied but no explicit security headers detected in the provided data. The absence of privacy and cookie policies and lack of incident response contacts indicate compliance gaps, especially regarding GDPR. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified in the HTML content. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager requires ongoing monitoring for security risks. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not evident from the content. Overall, the site should enhance its security and privacy practices to improve trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add visible and verified contact information including company emails and phone numbers for customer support and incident response.
  3. Configure and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and security culture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
4Fstore.lv is an e-commerce retail website likely selling sportswear and related products, targeting Latvian customers.
Key services
Online sales of sportswear and accessories
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Webpack (indicated by chunked JS files), Google Fonts (Inter font)
Frameworks
Venia (Magento PWA Studio)
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies detected in the HTML content.
  3. No explicit contact information such as emails or phone numbers found in the provided HTML.
  4. Site uses Magento PWA Studio framework indicating modern e-commerce platform.
  5. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tracking.
  6. No security headers or SSL configuration details available from provided data.
  7. No evidence of WAF or security blocking mechanisms.
  8. Content is safe and appropriate for general audiences.
  9. Site appears to be a regional e-commerce retailer for sportswear in Latvia.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Magento PWA Studio, a modern framework for progressive web applications, indicating a contemporary technical infrastructure. JavaScript chunking and Google Fonts usage suggest optimized front-end delivery. Google Tag Manager integration supports marketing and analytics tracking. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization but basic accessibility and SEO features. No hosting provider or SSL configuration details were available. The site would benefit from enhanced technical SEO, accessibility improvements, and security header implementation to reduce technical risks and improve user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with 4fstore.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review 4fstore.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.