Skip to main content

Security report for 4e-parentproject.eu

4e-parent · Non-profit · Italy

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

44/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

4e-parent is a European non-profit initiative focused on promoting parental equality and engagement from the earliest stages of child development. The website serves as a platform for advocacy, education, and resource dissemination, targeting parents, policymakers, and social organizations. The project is positioned as a niche social advocacy entity with partnerships in the health and social sectors, primarily operating in Italy. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme, integrating modern web technologies such as jQuery and Google Analytics via Site Kit. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforcement and standard security headers, but lacks explicit security or incident response policies. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant, reflecting a responsible approach to data protection. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and well-aligned with its non-profit mission.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching 4e-parentproject.eu

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
44

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention 4e-parentproject.eu, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for 4e-parentproject.eu right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The project operates in the non-profit sector, focusing on parental rights and social change. Its business model revolves around advocacy, education, and partnership collaboration. The presence of multiple partner organizations such as ISS and other health-related entities indicates a strong ecosystem. The website content and structure suggest a small-sized organization with a clear target audience of parents and social advocates. Revenue streams are likely grant-based or funded through partnerships rather than commercial sales. The project maintains a consistent brand and delivers relevant, quality content to its audience, supporting its market position as a credible social initiative.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a good SSL configuration and includes essential security headers like Strict-Transport-Security and Content-Security-Policy. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, there is no visible security policy or incident response information, which could be improved to enhance transparency and readiness. The use of Google Analytics is managed via Site Kit, indicating controlled data collection. Overall, the security posture is good for a non-profit website but could benefit from formalized security documentation and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Add incident response contact details such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance website accessibility to meet higher standards for inclusivity.
  5. Consider implementing a vulnerability disclosure policy and hosting a security.txt file.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
4e-parent
Description
4e-parent is a European non-profit project focused on promoting parental equality and engagement from the earliest days. It provides resources, advocacy, training, and reports to support parental rights and social change.
Key services
Resource provision, Training and education, Advocacy for parental leave reform, Data and report dissemination
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Divi Theme, jQuery, Google Analytics, Site Kit by Google
Frameworks
Divi Builder
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Site Kit by Google
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed WordPress site using Divi theme.
  2. Content is focused on social advocacy for parental equality in Italy and Europe.
  3. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity detected.
  4. Good use of HTTPS and security headers.
  5. Contact information is limited to email and social media; no phone or physical address found.
  6. No explicit terms of service or security policy pages detected.
  7. Cookie and privacy policies are present and appear GDPR compliant.
  8. Google Analytics is used for tracking with Site Kit integration.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a stable and widely used CMS platform, WordPress, with the Divi theme providing flexible design capabilities. It uses jQuery and integrates Google Analytics through Site Kit, reflecting a modern but standard technology stack. Hosting is provided by Aruba Business Srl, a reputable Italian hosting provider. Performance is moderate, with caching and minified CSS assets observed. Mobile optimization is good, ensuring usability across devices. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. Technical debt appears low, but opportunities exist to improve accessibility and formalize security and privacy documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with 4e-parentproject.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review 4e-parentproject.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.