Skip to main content

Security report for 3dadstudio.com

"3D AD" ltd · Real Estate · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

3D AD ltd is a small architecture and project management firm based in Latvia, specializing in architecture, interior design, and project management services. The company maintains partnerships with civil engineers, surveying firms, and construction companies, positioning itself as a local service provider in the real estate sector. The website reflects a professional presence with good design and clear navigation, targeting clients and partners in the construction and property development industries. Technically, the website is built on the Webnode platform, hosted via AWS Cloudfront CDN, and uses modern web technologies including JavaScript and CSS. It integrates Facebook Pixel and Google Tag Manager for marketing and analytics purposes. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and implements a cookie consent mechanism but lacks advanced security headers and privacy policy documentation, which are areas for improvement. The WHOIS data for the domain is missing, indicating potential registration issues that could affect trustworthiness. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced security and compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching 3dadstudio.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the real estate sector with a focus on architecture and project management. Its business model is service-oriented, targeting local clients and partners such as civil engineers and construction firms. The presence of partner logos and certifications like ARB-LAS suggests a credible network. The website content and structure indicate a small-sized enterprise with consistent branding and moderate market positioning. The lack of detailed WHOIS data and absence of contact emails or phone numbers on the site may limit direct client engagement and trust. The company leverages social media platforms for outreach and marketing. Growth opportunities may lie in expanding digital presence and improving compliance with privacy and security standards.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and a cookie consent banner in place, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web vulnerabilities. No incident response or security policy information is provided, and no security.txt or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are found. The use of third-party tracking scripts like Facebook Pixel and Google Tag Manager introduces moderate user tracking, which should be managed carefully to comply with GDPR. The missing WHOIS data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and ownership transparency. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add essential security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options) to enhance protection against web attacks.
  3. Publish incident response and security contact information to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve transparency.
  4. Verify and update domain registration details to ensure legitimacy and reduce risk of domain-related issues.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts to maintain a secure and user-friendly website.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
"3D AD" ltd
Registration number
40203213923
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
"3D AD" ltd
Description
Architecture, Interior design, Project management
Key services
Architecture, Interior design, Project management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CSS, Facebook Pixel
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF
  2. No WHOIS registration data found for domain
  3. Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  4. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found
  5. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn
  6. Uses Facebook Pixel and Google Tag Manager for tracking
  7. Business is a small architecture and project management firm in Latvia
  8. Contact address and registration number provided in footer
  9. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found
  10. No security headers detected in HTML content
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webnode CMS platform and uses AWS Cloudfront CDN for content delivery, which supports good performance and scalability. The front-end employs standard web technologies including JavaScript and CSS, with integration of Facebook Pixel and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation and design quality. However, the absence of advanced security headers and limited SEO optimization indicate areas for technical improvement. The lack of WHOIS data suggests potential domain registration issues that should be addressed. Overall, the technical infrastructure is adequate for a small business but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with 3dadstudio.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review 3dadstudio.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.