Skip to main content

Security report for 35km.lv

Pareiza lieta · Non-profit · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.35km.lv represents a small non-profit organization named "Pareiza lieta" dedicated to the preservation and promotion of cultural heritage related to Viktor Tsoi in Latvia. The organization focuses on fundraising and organizing commemorative events, leveraging multiple payment platforms such as Donation Alerts, SwedBank, and PayPal. The site targets fans of Viktor Tsoi and cultural event attendees, providing them with updates, donation options, and social media engagement. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including Bootstrap and jQuery, and it is optimized for mobile devices with good SEO practices. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and uses some security plugins but lacks certain security headers and explicit privacy or cookie policies, which are areas for improvement. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain registration verification. Overall, the site is functional, trustworthy, and serves its niche audience effectively, but it would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security hardening.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching 35km.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the non-profit sector with a niche focus on cultural heritage related to Viktor Tsoi. Its business model revolves around donations and community engagement through events and social media. The presence of multiple payment channels and active social media accounts indicates a well-established fundraising ecosystem. The organization was founded in 2011 and is registered in Latvia. The website content and branding are consistent and professional, supporting its credibility. Partnerships with payment processors and a related official site (pareizalieta.lv) strengthen its operational ecosystem. Growth indicators include recent event promotions and awards, such as the Kazakhstan FREEDOM TICKETON 2025 cultural prize. The organization maintains a moderate market position within its cultural niche.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, the absence of key security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces its defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are provided, which limits transparency in security management. The site uses several WordPress plugins, which require regular updates to mitigate vulnerabilities. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies, which could expose the organization to regulatory risks under GDPR. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small non-profit but requires enhancements to meet best practices and compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Establish a security.txt file and incident response contact information for vulnerability reporting.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate security risks.
  5. Enhance transparency by providing clear contact information and business credentials on the website.

Contact details published on the site

Legal name
Biedrība Pareiza lieta
Registration number
40008187501
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Pareiza lieta
Description
Памятник Виктору Цою в Латвии. Организация „Pareiza lieta” занимается сбором средств на поддержание и развитие проектов, связанных с Виктором Цоем в Латвии.
Key services
Fundraising via Donation Alerts, SwedBank, PayPal, Visa, MasterCard, Organizing commemorative events, Providing information and updates about Viktor Tsoi memorial projects
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, Bootstrap, jQuery, Yoast SEO, WPBakery Page Builder, MediaElement.js, Instagram Feed plugin, Custom Facebook Feed plugin, Contact Form 7, Photo Gallery plugin, Pearl Header Builder
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (e.g., GDPR compliance plugin)

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based non-profit site dedicated to Viktor Tsoi memorial projects in Latvia.
  2. Content is primarily in Russian with some English metadata.
  3. Multiple social media channels are linked and active.
  4. Donation mechanisms are prominently featured with multiple payment options.
  5. No privacy or cookie policies explicitly found on the site.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information present.
  7. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  8. Site uses HTTPS and modern web technologies but lacks some security headers.
  9. No signs of adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using a combination of popular plugins including WPBakery Page Builder, Yoast SEO, and various media and social feed plugins. The front-end uses Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for interactivity. The site loads external resources from trusted CDNs such as MaxCDN and Google Fonts. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected, and mobile optimization is good. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported by Yoast SEO plugin and proper meta tags including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. The site could benefit from improved security headers and privacy compliance measures to reduce technical debt and regulatory risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with 35km.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review 35km.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.