Skip to main content

Security report for 3-d-eye.co.uk

3D Eye · Retail · United Kingdom

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

41/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

3D Eye is a well-established creative production house based in West London, specializing in delivering 3D solutions for the fashion, retail, events, and brand activation industries. Founded in 1999, the company operates from a large workshop and studio, offering integrated design and fabrication services with a skilled in-house team. Their market position is strong, supported by collaborations with high-profile clients and a professional online presence. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins and themes, providing good SEO and mobile optimization, though some performance and security enhancements are possible. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and incident response information. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy, but improvements in privacy and security policies are recommended.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 29 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching 3-d-eye.co.uk

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
37
Security headers
25
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
41

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

3D Eye targets creative industries including fashion brands, event organizers, and retail businesses, offering bespoke creative production and fabrication services. Their business model focuses on delivering high-impact visual and physical installations, supported by a skilled multidisciplinary team. The company showcases a portfolio of recent projects and notable clients, indicating a competitive advantage in craftsmanship and integrated services. Growth indicators include active social media engagement and a well-maintained website. No direct partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of a security.txt file indicate gaps in security best practices. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are provided, which could hinder timely response to security incidents. The use of WordPress plugins is standard, with no known vulnerable libraries detected. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be significantly improved with additional controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with a consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Create and expose a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and incident response.
  4. Configure Google Analytics properly or remove the plugin to avoid misleading tracking indications.
  5. Provide explicit incident response contact information and consider adding a dedicated security or abuse email address.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
3D Eye
Description
West London based creative production house delivering 3D solutions for creative industries. Since 1999, 3D Eye has been at the forefront of creative production—bringing ambitious concepts to life for the fashion, architecture, events, and brand activation industries. From an 18,000 sq ft workshop and studio in North West London, offering fully integrated design and fabrication services under one roof.
Key services
Design and fabrication, Sculpting, Mould making, Carpentry, Metalwork, Finishing, Creative production for fashion, retail, events, brand activation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.6.5, Yoast SEO plugin, WPZOOM Framework, Inspiro Premium theme, jQuery, Swiper.js, Magnific Popup, Instagram Widget by WPZOOM, Google Fonts
Frameworks
WPZOOM Framework
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries
  • Use of security plugins (e.g., WordPress standard security)

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional creative production house based in West London.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided with company emails and phone number.
  4. No security.txt or incident response info found.
  5. Uses WordPress CMS with modern plugins and themes.
  6. No active Google Analytics tracking configured.
  7. No advertising or affiliate programs detected.
  8. Good SEO metadata and structured data present.
  9. No security headers detected in HTML content.
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.6.5 using the Inspiro Premium theme and WPZOOM Framework, leveraging plugins such as Yoast SEO and Instagram Widget by WPZOOM. It uses modern web technologies including jQuery, Swiper.js, and Magnific Popup for UI enhancements. The site loads Google Fonts and external media from Instagram and Vimeo. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness and SEO metadata. However, no advanced caching or CDN details were found. Accessibility is basic, with room for improvement in ARIA roles and keyboard navigation. No broken links or errors were detected in the provided content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with 3-d-eye.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review 3-d-eye.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.