Skip to main content

Security report for 21grams.com

21grams · Transportation · Sweden

High risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

21grams is a Swedish-based company specializing in optimizing and digitizing postal and communication services for businesses primarily in the Nordic region. As part of the Unifiedpost Group since 2021, it leverages its expertise to offer services such as optimized postage, digitized post delivery, and simplified payment solutions. The website reflects a professional B2B service provider with a clear focus on enhancing business communications and operational efficiency. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and tools including Google Tag Manager and Usercentrics for consent management, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and consent mechanisms in place, though explicit security headers and policies are not visible, suggesting room for improvement. Overall, the site is trustworthy, well-branded, and provides clear contact information, supporting its credibility in the market.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching 21grams.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
80
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
10
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

21grams operates in the transportation sector with a niche focus on postal and digital communication optimization. Its business model is B2B, targeting organizations seeking cost-effective and efficient mail handling and digitization solutions. The company benefits from being part of the Unifiedpost Group, which enhances its market position and trustworthiness. Key services include file exchange, e-archive, track & trace, and document tracking, supported by a partner ecosystem including Postportalen, Addoro, Europe Post, Mailworld, and Strålfors. The website content and structure indicate a medium-sized enterprise with a clear growth trajectory and strategic partnerships. The company emphasizes innovation and customer-centric solutions, positioning itself as a specialist in postal digitization and payment simplification.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and integrates Usercentrics for GDPR-compliant consent management, reflecting a commitment to privacy and security. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics, which is standard but requires careful configuration to avoid privacy issues. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options and lack of a published security policy or incident response contact reduces the overall security maturity. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site uses secure and updated libraries like jQuery 3.7.1 and WordPress 6.7.2, minimizing risks from outdated components. To enhance security posture, the company should implement and document security headers, publish a security policy, and consider a vulnerability disclosure program.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies accessible from the website footer.
  2. Add security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to improve protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.
  4. Introduce a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins to ensure they are up to date and free from vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
21grams
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
21grams
Description
We optimize and digitize organizations post, reinforcing your business and relations. Services include optimized postage, digitized post, and simplified payments across the Nordic region.
Key services
Optimized postage, Digitize post, Simplify payments, File exchange, E-archive, Track & Trace, Document tracking, E-register
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.7.2, jQuery 3.7.1, Google Tag Manager, Usercentrics Consent Management, Yoast SEO plugin, Flickity carousel, Contact Form 7, URL Shortify plugin
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by canonical URL https://www.21grams.com/)
  • Consent management via Usercentrics
  • Google Tag Manager for analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Usercentrics Consent Management
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to postal and digital communication services.
  3. Use of modern web technologies and consent management tools.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, and physical address.
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in the HTML content.
  6. Security headers and explicit security policies are not visible in the HTML content.
  7. Website is part of a larger group (Unifiedpost Group), enhancing trustworthiness.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform with a well-maintained tech stack including jQuery, Google Tag Manager, and Usercentrics for consent management. The site uses responsive design techniques and optimized images for good mobile performance. SEO is enhanced by Yoast SEO plugin and proper meta tags including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. The presence of multiple external domains for partner services and applications indicates a modular and integrated service ecosystem. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in caching and script optimization. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with ARIA roles and better keyboard navigation support. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business goals effectively but can benefit from enhanced security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with 21grams.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review 21grams.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.