Skip to main content

Security report for 1partner.lv

1Partner Latvia · Real Estate · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

1Partner.lv is a Latvian real estate company specializing in property sales, rentals, and valuation services for both private and business clients. The website positions itself as a leading real estate firm in Latvia with a strong client base exceeding 40,000 satisfied customers. The company maintains partnerships with major Latvian banks, enhancing its credibility and market presence. The digital platform is built on WordPress, leveraging popular plugins such as Yoast SEO and Contact Form 7, and integrates tracking tools like Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for marketing and analytics purposes. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and provides multiple contact channels including forms protected by Google reCAPTCHA.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching 1partner.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business model focuses on brokerage and valuation services within the Latvian real estate market, targeting both individual and corporate clients. The company benefits from strategic partnerships with financial institutions, which likely facilitate client financing options. The website content and structure indicate a medium-sized enterprise with a professional online presence. The absence of WHOIS data limits full verification of domain legitimacy, but the business information and partner affiliations suggest a reputable operation. The company appears to be established since 2017, with consistent branding and a clear market position in real estate.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and uses Google reCAPTCHA v3 to protect its contact forms, indicating a baseline security posture. The presence of Wordfence scripts suggests active use of security plugins. However, the site lacks explicit security headers and published security or incident response policies, which are recommended for enhanced protection and transparency. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no visible cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with additional controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance browser security.
  2. Add a visible cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and improve user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response plan on the website to demonstrate preparedness and build trust.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate risks from known vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider performing a full security audit and penetration test to identify and remediate any hidden vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
1Partner Latvia
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
1Partner Latvia
Description
1Partner Kinnisvara teenuste hulka kuuluvad kinnisvara ost, müük, üür ja hindamine. Lahenduse saab nii era- kui ka äriklient.
Key services
Real estate sales, Real estate rentals, Property valuation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery, jQuery UI, Contact Form 7, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Clipboard.js, jqPlot charting
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugin Wordfence (indicated by Wordfence scripts)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional real estate service platform targeting Latvian clients.
  2. Content is in Latvian language with some Estonian language elements in forms.
  3. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins for SEO and forms.
  4. Includes multiple contact forms collecting personal data with reCAPTCHA protection.
  5. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banners detected, though privacy policy page exists.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain registration trust verification.
  7. No security policy or incident response information published.
  8. Website uses Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for tracking and marketing.
  9. Partner logos of major Latvian banks indicate business credibility.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using a modern tech stack including jQuery, jQuery UI, and various JavaScript libraries for UI and analytics. SEO is enhanced via the Yoast SEO plugin, and the site includes structured data in JSON-LD format for better search engine understanding. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts and use of CDN-hosted fonts and libraries. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design and accessible navigation. The site uses Google reCAPTCHA v3 for spam protection on forms. Technical debt appears low, but the absence of some security headers and cookie consent mechanisms indicates room for improvement in compliance and security best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with 1partner.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review 1partner.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.