Skip to main content

Security report for 1k.lv

SIA 1k.lv · Real Estate · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

1k.lv is a Latvian technology-driven real estate marketplace and agency offering a full spectrum of property sales services including valuation, marketing, legal support, and transaction closure. The company positions itself as a professional and licensed agent with 15 years of experience, targeting property sellers and buyers in Latvia. The website is well-structured with clear business information and contact details, supported by structured data for SEO. Technically, the site uses modern React-based infrastructure with module scripts, Google Fonts, and integrates with services like Supabase and Google Analytics. Security posture is good with HTTPS and a strict Content Security Policy, though the use of 'unsafe-inline' and 'unsafe-eval' in CSP reduces security effectiveness. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism or Terms of Service page. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and well-optimized for its market, but could improve security and compliance aspects.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching 1k.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
49
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the real estate sector in Latvia, leveraging technology to differentiate itself as the first tech-driven marketplace in the country. Its business model focuses on providing end-to-end real estate services, from property preparation to legal transaction closure. The target customers are property owners seeking efficient and profitable sales. The company is a small-sized entity founded in 2024, under the parent company SIA Royal Estate. It uses digital marketing and professional photography to enhance property visibility. The presence of structured data and social media links indicates a modern digital marketing approach. No affiliate or partner domains were identified beyond standard external service providers.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and a Content Security Policy is implemented, though it allows 'unsafe-inline' and 'unsafe-eval' which are security risks. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy is present, and no incident response contacts are provided. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The site lacks cookie consent mechanisms, which is a GDPR compliance gap. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business but can be improved by tightening CSP, adding security policies, and implementing cookie consent.

Recommendations

  1. Remove or restrict 'unsafe-inline' and 'unsafe-eval' directives in the Content Security Policy to enhance protection against XSS attacks.
  2. Implement a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with GDPR requirements.
  3. Add a clear Terms of Service page to define user and business obligations.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve security culture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA 1k.lv
Registration number
40103491228
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA 1k.lv
Description
Tehnoloģijās balstīts nekustamā īpašuma pakalpojumu tirgus Latvijā. Dokumenti, aģenti, juristi, vērtētāji — viss vienuviet.
Key services
Property preparation and value enhancement, Accurate property valuation, Professional photo sessions, Targeted marketing campaigns, Active communication and property presentation, Legal security and documentation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, JavaScript ES Modules, Google Fonts, Supabase (API and WebSocket), Google Analytics, Resend API
Frameworks
React
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • Strict Content Security Policy with limited external sources
  • Use of HTTPS
  • No inline scripts except allowed unsafe-inline and unsafe-eval for specific trusted domains
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Resend API
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented in Latvian language targeting local real estate market.
  3. Strong use of structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO and business information.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided in multiple locations and structured data.
  5. Security headers are present but CSP could be improved by removing unsafe directives.
  6. No cookie consent mechanism detected despite GDPR relevance.
  7. No visible Terms of Service or security policy pages.
  8. Use of modern web technologies including React and module scripts.
  9. Google Analytics is used for tracking with moderate user tracking level.
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using React with modern JavaScript module loading and optimized font loading from Google Fonts. It integrates with Supabase for backend services and uses Google Analytics for tracking. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and critical CSS inlined for performance. Accessibility is basic but present. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph, Twitter cards, and structured data. Hosting provider is not explicitly identified. Performance is moderate with some loading spinners visible in the content placeholders, indicating dynamic content loading. No CMS detected, suggesting a custom or framework-based build.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with 1k.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review 1k.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.