Skip to main content

Security report for 1home.eu

1Home · Real Estate · Estonia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

42/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

1Home is a regional student housing provider focusing on accommodation for international students and interns in Baltic states and Poland. The company offers freshly renovated shared apartments with services such as weekly housekeeping, fixed utilities, and high-speed Wi-Fi. The website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce and Elementor, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. It integrates common analytics and marketing tools like Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and reCAPTCHA on forms, but lacks comprehensive security headers and explicit GDPR cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy image but could improve privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching 1home.eu

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
42

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets international students seeking affordable and convenient housing in cities like Tallinn, Riga, Vilnius, Kaunas, and Warsaw. Its business model revolves around online room bookings and accommodation services without broker fees. The presence of testimonials and a partner site (Duck Republik Student Hotel) supports its market positioning. The company appears small-sized, founded around 2016, with a consistent regional focus. The website content and branding are consistent and relevant to its audience, supporting business credibility.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses reCAPTCHA to protect contact forms, which are positive security practices. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces its defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which limits transparency. Privacy compliance is basic, lacking explicit cookie consent banners and detailed privacy policies. These gaps present moderate risk and should be addressed to enhance security and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Add a visible cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to improve incident response readiness.
  4. Enhance privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR compliance and data retention.
  5. Consider adding verified company contact emails and physical addresses to improve trust and credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
1Home
Description
Student housing and accommodation in freshly renovated shared apartments in Tallinn, Riga, Vilnius, Kaunas and Warsaw. Accommodation for international students and interns in shared apartments.
Key services
Student housing, Shared apartments, Weekly housekeeping, No broker fees, Fixed utilities, High-speed Wi-Fi
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, jQuery, WooCommerce, Elementor, Contact Form 7, Google Fonts, Yoast SEO
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WooCommerce
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA on contact form
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, MonsterInsights
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
MonsterInsights
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website targets international students for housing in Baltic and Polish cities.
  2. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins for SEO, analytics, and forms.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banner found, which may impact GDPR compliance.
  4. Contact form uses reCAPTCHA for spam protection.
  5. No visible phone numbers or physical addresses on homepage; contact primarily via form and social media.
  6. Security headers are minimal; HTTPS is enforced.
  7. Social media presence mainly Facebook.
  8. Terms and privacy policies are present but basic in scope.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern WordPress CMS with popular plugins for SEO, analytics, and e-commerce capabilities. It loads fonts from Google Fonts and Adobe Typekit, and uses jQuery and WooCommerce for functionality. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility features are basic. The site could benefit from improved security headers and privacy compliance features. Hosting provider details are not explicit from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but has room for security and privacy improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with 1home.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review 1home.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.