Skip to main content

Security report for 16h24.org

Fonds de dotation 16H24 · Non-profit · France

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Fonds de dotation 16H24 is a French non-profit foundation dedicated to supporting young people placed in foster care or social assistance to become autonomous between the ages of 16 and 24. The foundation operates under the aegis of Fondation Caritas and focuses on funding projects that help these youths overcome social and economic challenges. The website is professionally designed using WordPress and Elementor, with good SEO practices implemented via Yoast SEO. It is hosted by OVH sas, a reputable provider, and uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration. Security measures include the use of hCaptcha on forms and domain status protections, though DNSSEC is not enabled and security headers are lacking. Privacy compliance is basic, with a privacy policy present but no explicit GDPR compliance statements or detailed cookie policies. Contact information is limited to a contact form, with no direct emails or phone numbers publicly listed. Overall, the website is trustworthy and well-positioned within its niche non-profit sector.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MSSQL

      Port 1433 (MSSQL) is publicly accessible - MSSQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MSSQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: Redis

      Port 6379 (Redis) is publicly accessible - Redis - In-memory database

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to Redis using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching 16h24.org

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
50
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The foundation occupies a niche market focused on social welfare for youth in France, leveraging partnerships such as Fondation Caritas for legitimacy and support. Its business model is grant and project funding for social initiatives. The target audience includes social workers, donors, and the youth beneficiaries themselves. The website content and structure support clear communication of mission and impact, with testimonials and statistics enhancing credibility. The organization is relatively young, founded in 2021, with a domain registered in 2020, indicating alignment between digital presence and business history. No direct revenue streams or commercial activities are evident, consistent with non-profit status.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enforced and use of hCaptcha to protect forms from abuse. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security maturity. No incident response or security policy information is published, which could hinder response to security events. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The domain registration includes clientDeleteProhibited and clientTransferProhibited statuses, which help prevent unauthorized domain changes. Overall, security is adequate for the site's purpose but could be improved with additional hardening and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and readiness.
  4. Enhance privacy compliance by providing a comprehensive GDPR-compliant privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism details.
  5. Improve accessibility features to better serve all users and comply with standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fonds de dotation 16H24
Description
Le fonds de dotation 16H24 finance des projets aidant les jeunes placés en foyers ou familles d’accueil à devenir progressivement autonomes entre 16 et 24 ans révolus.
Key services
Funding projects for youth autonomy, Supporting social initiatives for children placed in foster care
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO, hCaptcha
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of hCaptcha for forms
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
axept.io
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a French non-profit foundation focused on youth emancipation.
  2. Content is well structured and professionally presented in French.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage; contact form is present.
  4. No explicit privacy or security policies beyond legal mentions page.
  5. Use of modern WordPress plugins and SEO best practices.
  6. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  7. No social media links explicitly found in HTML content.
  8. No terms of service page detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with Elementor page builder and Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a modern and maintainable CMS infrastructure. Hosting is provided by OVH sas, a well-known European provider. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected, and mobile optimization is good. The site uses hCaptcha for bot protection on forms, enhancing security. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. However, the site lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC, which are recommended for improved security posture. The technical stack is appropriate for a small non-profit organization with room for incremental improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with 16h24.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review 16h24.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.