Skip to main content

Security report for 12linijas.lv

12 LĪNIJAS · Real Estate · Latvia

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

41/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

12 LĪNIJAS is a Latvian architecture firm specializing in architectural design, heritage building restoration, and interior projects. The website showcases their portfolio, including award nominations and completed projects, positioning them as a recognized player in the Latvian architectural sector. The firm targets clients interested in architectural services and cultural heritage preservation. Technically, the website is built on the Berta.me CMS platform, uses Google Fonts and Swiper.js for galleries, and includes Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is mobile-optimized with good design and navigation but lacks advanced accessibility features and comprehensive SEO optimization. Security posture is moderate; HTTPS status and security headers are not confirmed, and no privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating compliance gaps. No contact emails or phone numbers are provided, limiting direct communication channels. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, restricting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site is professional and content-rich but would benefit from enhanced security, privacy compliance, and contact transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching 12linijas.lv

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
10
Average
41

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The firm operates in the Real Estate sector focusing on architecture and heritage restoration. Their business model revolves around providing architectural services and showcasing their work to attract clients and partners. The presence of award nominations and media references suggests a reputable market position. The website targets architecture enthusiasts and potential clients in Latvia. Revenue streams likely come from architectural projects and competitions. The firm maintains social media presence on Facebook and Instagram, supporting marketing efforts. No evidence of subsidiaries or parent companies was found. The firm appears to be a small-sized entity with a focused niche. The lack of detailed business registration or contact info on the site limits deeper business intelligence insights.

Security posture

The website currently exhibits a basic security posture. HTTPS usage is not confirmed, and no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. No incident response or security contact information is provided. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics, which may collect user data without explicit consent mechanisms. The CMS platform (Berta.me) should be regularly updated to mitigate vulnerabilities. Overall, the site lacks several best practices in web security and privacy, exposing it to potential risks and compliance issues.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and ensure all site resources load securely.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details and user consent mechanisms.
  3. Include clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for business and security incident reporting.
  4. Configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  5. Regularly update CMS and third-party scripts to patch vulnerabilities and improve performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
12 LĪNIJAS
Description
Architecture firm showcasing architectural projects, achievements, and awards primarily in Latvia.
Key services
Architectural design, Heritage building restoration, Interior design, Competition entries
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Fonts (Roboto), Swiper.js (image gallery), Berta.me CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content about architectural projects and awards.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided in the content.
  4. Social media presence includes Facebook and Instagram links.
  5. Uses Google Fonts and Google Tag Manager for analytics.
  6. No visible security headers or HTTPS status available from provided data.
  7. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error, limiting domain trust verification.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses the Berta.me CMS platform, Google Fonts (Roboto), and Swiper.js for image galleries. Google Tag Manager is integrated for analytics tracking. The site is mobile responsive with good design and navigation clarity. However, no advanced accessibility features were detected. SEO optimization is basic with meta tags present but no structured data beyond a simple JSON-LD WebSite schema. Performance is moderate, with no explicit indicators of slow loading but also no advanced optimization techniques observed. The site lacks visible security headers and privacy compliance features, indicating technical debt in security and compliance areas.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with 12linijas.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review 12linijas.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.