Security Directory

This website has 1 high-priority security issue(s) that should be addressed promptly. Overall security score: 50/100 (unknown risk level). A comprehensive security review is recommended.

This website has 2 high-priority security issue(s) that should be addressed promptly. Overall security score: 50/100 (unknown risk level). A comprehensive security review is recommended.

Q

Quintiles

quintiles.com

96

This website has 6 security issue(s) identified for improvement. Overall security score: 50/100 (unknown risk level). A comprehensive security review is recommended.

This website has 3 critical security issue(s) requiring immediate attention. Overall security score: 50/100 (unknown risk level). A comprehensive security review is recommended.

This website has 6 critical security issue(s) requiring immediate attention. Overall security score: 50/100 (unknown risk level). A comprehensive security review is recommended.

This website has 8 security issue(s) identified for improvement. Overall security score: 50/100 (unknown risk level). A comprehensive security review is recommended.

This website has 3 critical security issue(s) requiring immediate attention. Overall security score: 50/100 (unknown risk level). A comprehensive security review is recommended.

B

BPCE

bpce.fr

96

This website has 6 security issue(s) identified for improvement. Overall security score: 50/100 (unknown risk level). A comprehensive security review is recommended.

This website has 1 high-priority security issue(s) that should be addressed promptly. Overall security score: 50/100 (unknown risk level). A comprehensive security review is recommended.

This website has 6 security issue(s) identified for improvement. Overall security score: 50/100 (unknown risk level). A comprehensive security review is recommended.

This website has 7 security issue(s) identified for improvement. Overall security score: 50/100 (unknown risk level). A comprehensive security review is recommended.

This website has 1 high-priority security issue(s) that should be addressed promptly. Overall security score: 50/100 (unknown risk level). A comprehensive security review is recommended.

The website's security posture is currently at significant risk due to critical failures in its DNS infrastructure and email authentication mechanisms, which are fundamental to reliable and secure online presence. The absence of DNS resolution, name servers, and domain registration issues indicates potential service outages, loss of domain control, or susceptibility to domain hijacking. Email systems lack proper authentication (missing DKIM and other email security configurations), increasing the risk of phishing, spoofing, and brand damage. Medium-level issues in security headers, GDPR compliance, NIS2 directives, and network security scans highlight gaps in regulatory adherence and overall defense-in-depth strategy. Although SSL/TLS implementation is strong, this alone cannot compensate for foundational DNS and email security weaknesses. The failure to implement DNSSEC and CAA records further exposes the domain to DNS spoofing and certificate misuse. Immediate remediation is critical to maintain operational continuity, protect brand reputation, and comply with regulatory requirements. Addressing these issues will strengthen trust with customers and stakeholders while reducing attack surface exposure.

This website has 8 security issue(s) identified for improvement. Overall security score: 50/100 (unknown risk level). A comprehensive security review is recommended.

This website has 8 security issue(s) identified for improvement. Overall security score: 50/100 (unknown risk level). A comprehensive security review is recommended.

The website demonstrates a generally strong security posture with no critical issues and high scores in SSL/TLS and network security. However, notable gaps exist in email security, particularly the absence of a DMARC record, which exposes the business to email spoofing and phishing risks. Medium-level concerns around missing security headers, incomplete GDPR and NIS2 compliance, and DNS configurations suggest potential vulnerabilities in regulatory adherence and domain protection. DNSSEC is not enabled, which could lead to DNS spoofing or cache poisoning attacks. While network security is robust, addressing these medium and high-priority issues is essential to mitigate reputational damage, protect customer data, and ensure regulatory compliance. Proactive resolution of these issues will strengthen trust with customers and partners. Overall, the business should focus on enhancing email authentication protocols and compliance frameworks to reduce threat exposure and legal risks.

This website has 9 security issue(s) identified for improvement. Overall security score: 50/100 (unknown risk level). A comprehensive security review is recommended.

This website has 6 security issue(s) identified for improvement. Overall security score: 50/100 (unknown risk level). A comprehensive security review is recommended.

R

RSM US LLP

rsmus.com

91

This website has 8 security issue(s) identified for improvement. Overall security score: 50/100 (unknown risk level). A comprehensive security review is recommended.

D

Deloitte Australia

deloitte.com.au

96

This website has 6 security issue(s) identified for improvement. Overall security score: 50/100 (unknown risk level). A comprehensive security review is recommended.

D

Deloitte UK

deloitte.co.uk

95

This website has 7 security issue(s) identified for improvement. Overall security score: 50/100 (unknown risk level). A comprehensive security review is recommended.

B

BforBank

bforbank.com

93

This website has 6 security issue(s) identified for improvement. Overall security score: 50/100 (unknown risk level). A comprehensive security review is recommended.

B

Banco Bradesco S.A.

bradesco.com.br

91

This website has 7 security issue(s) identified for improvement. Overall security score: 50/100 (unknown risk level). A comprehensive security review is recommended.

This website has 3 critical security issue(s) requiring immediate attention. Overall security score: 50/100 (unknown risk level). A comprehensive security review is recommended.

E

Equicom

equicom.com

95

This website has 6 security issue(s) identified for improvement. Overall security score: 50/100 (unknown risk level). A comprehensive security review is recommended.

B

Buckaroo

buckaroo.nl

91

This website has 8 security issue(s) identified for improvement. Overall security score: 50/100 (unknown risk level). A comprehensive security review is recommended.

This website has 2 critical security issue(s) requiring immediate attention. Overall security score: 50/100 (unknown risk level). A comprehensive security review is recommended.

E

EFS Logistics

efslogistics.com

90

This website has 1 critical security issue(s) requiring immediate attention. Overall security score: 50/100 (unknown risk level). A comprehensive security review is recommended.

The website demonstrates a solid baseline security posture with no critical or high severity issues detected, and strong scores in SSL/TLS and network security modules. However, several medium-level concerns, particularly related to email security, DNS configuration, and compliance with GDPR and NIS2 requirements, indicate gaps that could expose the business to phishing risks, data protection non-compliance, and DNS-based attacks. The absence of key email authentication mechanisms like DKIM and a non-enforcing DMARC policy increases the risk of email spoofing and brand impersonation, potentially damaging customer trust. Additionally, the failure in security headers implementation and missing DNSSEC configuration present attack vectors for man-in-the-middle and DNS spoofing threats. Compliance-related failures (GDPR and NIS2) could lead to regulatory penalties and reputational damage if not addressed promptly. Overall, while network and transport layer security are robust, improving email and DNS security and aligning with regulatory frameworks are critical next steps to reduce risk and protect business assets.

This website has 1 critical security issue(s) requiring immediate attention. Overall security score: 50/100 (unknown risk level). A comprehensive security review is recommended.

This website has 1 high-priority security issue(s) that should be addressed promptly. Overall security score: 50/100 (unknown risk level). A comprehensive security review is recommended.

M

Marchesi 1824

marchesi1824.com

88

This website has 8 security issue(s) identified for improvement. Overall security score: 50/100 (unknown risk level). A comprehensive security review is recommended.

C

Church's Footwear

church-footwear.com

93

This website has 7 security issue(s) identified for improvement. Overall security score: 50/100 (unknown risk level). A comprehensive security review is recommended.

The website exhibits a generally strong security posture with no critical vulnerabilities detected and high scores in SSL/TLS and network security. However, there are notable medium and high-level issues that present risks, particularly in email security, compliance, and DNS configurations. The absence of a DMARC record is a significant weakness, increasing the risk of email spoofing and phishing attacks that can harm brand reputation and customer trust. Failure in GDPR and NIS2 compliance analyses suggests potential regulatory risks that could result in legal and financial penalties. The lack of key security headers and DNSSEC implementation further exposes the site to certain attack vectors. Addressing these issues will enhance overall security, reduce compliance risk, and strengthen email protection. Immediate attention to email authentication and compliance frameworks is essential for safeguarding business operations and customer data.

T

Twenty MC

twenty.mc

88

This website has 1 critical security issue(s) requiring immediate attention. Overall security score: 50/100 (unknown risk level). A comprehensive security review is recommended.

P

Prada Group

pradagroup.com

72

The website exhibits a moderate overall security posture with no critical issues but several high and medium-risk findings that require immediate attention. Notably, the absence of a Content-Security-Policy header and missing security policy documentation significantly increase exposure to web-based attacks and regulatory non-compliance. GDPR-related gaps such as the lack of a cookie consent banner and incomplete privacy policies present legal and reputational risks. The NIS2 compliance is notably poor, with critical deficiencies in incident response, security frameworks, and business continuity planning, which could severely impact operational resilience. Email security and network security postures are relatively strong, demonstrating effective controls in those areas. SSL/TLS configuration needs improvement to avoid potential trust and data integrity issues. Addressing these weaknesses will reduce vulnerability to cyber threats, enhance regulatory compliance, and protect customer trust and business continuity. Prioritizing remediation in governance, policy, and security headers will yield the highest business value and risk reduction.

This website has 7 security issue(s) identified for improvement. Overall security score: 50/100 (unknown risk level). A comprehensive security review is recommended.

This website has 3 critical security issue(s) requiring immediate attention. Overall security score: 50/100 (unknown risk level). A comprehensive security review is recommended.

This website has 8 security issue(s) identified for improvement. Overall security score: 50/100 (unknown risk level). A comprehensive security review is recommended.

This website has 1 critical security issue(s) requiring immediate attention. Overall security score: 50/100 (unknown risk level). A comprehensive security review is recommended.

The website demonstrates a concerning overall security posture, with no critical issues but multiple high and medium severity gaps primarily related to security headers, GDPR compliance, and NIS2 regulatory readiness. Key security controls such as Strict-Transport-Security, Content-Security-Policy, and X-Frame-Options headers are missing, increasing exposure to common web-based attacks. Significant GDPR compliance failures, including absence of a Privacy Policy, Cookie Policy, and consent banner, present legal and reputational risks. The lack of documented information security frameworks, policies, and incident response procedures indicates insufficient organizational security maturity and readiness to handle cyber incidents. While email security and network security aspects score relatively well, foundational security hygiene and regulatory compliance require urgent attention. Failure to address these issues may result in data breaches, regulatory penalties, and loss of customer trust. Immediate remediation will enhance both security posture and business credibility.

This website has 1 high-priority security issue(s) that should be addressed promptly. Overall security score: 50/100 (unknown risk level). A comprehensive security review is recommended.

This website has 2 critical security issue(s) requiring immediate attention. Overall security score: 50/100 (unknown risk level). A comprehensive security review is recommended.

This website has 4 high-priority security issue(s) that should be addressed promptly. Overall security score: 50/100 (unknown risk level). A comprehensive security review is recommended.

The website's security posture exhibits several critical vulnerabilities that pose immediate risks to business operations and data integrity. Notably, critical DNS health issues—including DNS resolution failures, absence of name servers, and domain registration problems—threaten website availability and brand trust. Email security also shows critical gaps, with no email authentication configured and missing DKIM records, increasing the risk of phishing and email spoofing attacks. Compliance-related assessments such as GDPR and NIS2 have failed, potentially exposing the business to regulatory penalties. While SSL/TLS configuration is strong, the absence of security headers and DNSSEC reduces defense-in-depth capabilities. The network security posture is moderate but requires attention due to failed network scans. Overall, immediate remediation of DNS and email security issues is essential to protect business continuity and reputation, followed by enhancements to compliance and security header implementation.

The website demonstrates a generally strong security posture with no critical vulnerabilities and high scores in SSL/TLS and network security. However, significant compliance gaps exist regarding GDPR requirements, notably the absence of a cookie policy and consent banner, which pose substantial legal and reputational risks. Medium-level issues in email security, DNS health, and security headers indicate potential exposure to phishing, spoofing, and information disclosure attacks. The lack of DNSSEC and incomplete security headers reduce the site's defenses against DNS spoofing and web-based threats. While network security and SSL/TLS implementations are robust, addressing GDPR and email authentication weaknesses should be prioritized to avoid regulatory penalties and maintain user trust. Enhancing privacy policies and contact information will further support compliance and transparency. Overall, the site is secure but requires focused improvements on data privacy and DNS/email configurations to mitigate business risks effectively.

This website has 1 critical security issue(s) requiring immediate attention. Overall security score: 50/100 (unknown risk level). A comprehensive security review is recommended.

H

Hays

hays.com.au

93

This website has 6 security issue(s) identified for improvement. Overall security score: 50/100 (unknown risk level). A comprehensive security review is recommended.

The website demonstrates a generally strong technical security foundation with perfect scores in SSL/TLS and network security, and a solid DNS health rating. However, significant gaps exist in compliance with GDPR regulations, including the absence of a cookie policy and consent banner, which expose the business to legal and reputational risks. The failure to implement key security headers and the lack of DNSSEC further increase vulnerability to certain attack vectors. Email security is fairly robust but can be improved to prevent phishing and spoofing risks. Overall, while the infrastructure is secure, regulatory compliance and privacy practices require urgent attention to avoid potential fines and loss of customer trust. Addressing these issues promptly will enhance the organization's security posture and regulatory standing. Prioritizing GDPR compliance and security headers will deliver the highest business value and risk reduction.

The website demonstrates a generally strong technical security posture with robust SSL/TLS implementation and good network security. However, significant gaps exist in the organizational security framework, particularly related to compliance with the NIS2 Directive, which impacts regulatory adherence and risk management. The absence of documented security policies, incident response procedures, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms exposes the business to potential operational disruptions and reputational damage in the event of a security incident. Additionally, failure to implement key security headers and GDPR compliance measures further increases exposure to data breaches and legal penalties. Email security is mostly sound but lacks DKIM records, which could affect email authenticity and increase phishing risks. DNS health is adequate but could be improved by enabling DNSSEC and configuring CAA records to prevent certificate misuse. Overall, the website requires urgent governance and policy enhancements to complement its technical defenses and align with regulatory requirements, ensuring business resilience and trustworthiness.