Medium-risk security reports

This website has 7 security issue(s) identified for improvement. Overall security score: 50/100 (unknown risk level). A comprehensive security review is recommended.

This website has 8 security issue(s) identified for improvement. Overall security score: 50/100 (unknown risk level). A comprehensive security review is recommended.

This website has 7 security issue(s) identified for improvement. Overall security score: 50/100 (unknown risk level). A comprehensive security review is recommended.

This website has 1 high-priority security issue(s) that should be addressed promptly. Overall security score: 50/100 (unknown risk level). A comprehensive security review is recommended.

This website has 1 critical security issue(s) requiring immediate attention. Overall security score: 50/100 (unknown risk level). A comprehensive security review is recommended.

This website has 1 critical security issue(s) requiring immediate attention. Overall security score: 50/100 (unknown risk level). A comprehensive security review is recommended.

This website has 6 security issue(s) identified for improvement. Overall security score: 50/100 (unknown risk level). A comprehensive security review is recommended.

This website has 6 security issue(s) identified for improvement. Overall security score: 50/100 (unknown risk level). A comprehensive security review is recommended.

This website has 1 critical security issue(s) requiring immediate attention. Overall security score: 50/100 (unknown risk level). A comprehensive security review is recommended.

This website has 7 security issue(s) identified for improvement. Overall security score: 50/100 (unknown risk level). A comprehensive security review is recommended.

This website has 1 high-priority security issue(s) that should be addressed promptly. Overall security score: 50/100 (unknown risk level). A comprehensive security review is recommended.

This website has 1 critical security issue(s) requiring immediate attention. Overall security score: 50/100 (unknown risk level). A comprehensive security review is recommended.

This website has 3 critical security issue(s) requiring immediate attention. Overall security score: 50/100 (unknown risk level). A comprehensive security review is recommended.

This website has 6 security issue(s) identified for improvement. Overall security score: 50/100 (unknown risk level). A comprehensive security review is recommended.

This website has 5 security issue(s) identified for improvement. Overall security score: 50/100 (unknown risk level).

This website has 1 high-priority security issue(s) that should be addressed promptly. Overall security score: 50/100 (unknown risk level). A comprehensive security review is recommended.

The website's overall security posture reveals significant vulnerabilities primarily in DNS configuration and compliance areas. While SSL/TLS and email security are robust, critical DNS issues including resolution failures and domain registration problems pose severe risks of service disruption and potential domain hijacking. The absence of essential security headers and failure to meet GDPR and NIS2 requirements expose the business to data protection and regulatory compliance risks. Network security is relatively strong but impaired by incomplete scans, limiting full visibility. These weaknesses could lead to reputational damage, legal penalties, and operational outages if not addressed promptly. Immediate remediation of DNS and compliance issues is imperative to safeguard business continuity and customer trust. The moderate security header deficiencies further necessitate attention to strengthen web application defenses. Prioritizing these gaps will align the security posture with industry best practices and regulatory standards.

The website demonstrates a strong overall security posture with no critical or high-risk issues detected and excellent scores in email security, SSL/TLS, and network security modules. However, medium-level issues related to security headers, GDPR compliance, NIS2 requirements, and DNS health indicate areas needing attention to strengthen defenses and regulatory adherence. Notably, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could expose the domain to DNS spoofing attacks. The absence of CAA records, although low risk, reduces control over certificate issuance. Addressing these gaps will reduce exposure to potential threats and ensure compliance with evolving security and privacy standards. The business benefits from robust foundational security but should prioritize remediation of medium-severity issues to maintain trust and regulatory compliance. Overall, the site is secure but improvements in governance and DNS configurations are recommended for optimal risk management.

The website demonstrates a strong security foundation with no critical or high severity vulnerabilities identified, and perfect scores in email security, SSL/TLS configuration, and overall network security posture. However, there are medium-level concerns primarily related to compliance and DNS configurations that require attention. The failure in Security Headers implementation and missing DNSSEC support could expose the site to certain attack vectors such as man-in-the-middle or content injection attacks. Additionally, the GDPR and NIS2 compliance issues indicate potential gaps in regulatory adherence, which could result in legal and financial risks. While low-level issues like missing CAA records are less immediately impactful, addressing them will enhance domain security. Overall, the site is secure but improving header policies, DNS security, and compliance controls will reduce risk and support business trust and regulatory alignment.

The website demonstrates a generally strong security posture with no critical or high-level vulnerabilities detected and excellent scores in SSL/TLS and network security. However, several medium-severity issues related to compliance and configuration, such as missing security headers, GDPR and NIS2 compliance failures, and lack of DNSSEC, indicate gaps that could increase risk exposure. Low-severity issues like complex SPF records and missing CAA records suggest room for DNS and email security improvements. These medium issues may affect regulatory compliance, increase susceptibility to certain attacks, and potentially impact customer trust and business continuity. Addressing these gaps will enhance the website's resilience against evolving threats and regulatory scrutiny. The company should prioritize closing these medium findings to maintain a robust security and compliance posture. Overall, the security foundation is solid but requires targeted improvements in security headers, DNS security, and compliance frameworks to mitigate medium risks effectively.

Related:stripe.compaypal.com

The website's overall security posture is concerning, with multiple critical and high-severity issues primarily in email security and regulatory compliance domains. While SSL/TLS and network security configurations are strong, significant gaps in security headers expose the site to common web-based attacks. The absence of key GDPR components such as Privacy Policy, Cookie Policy, and Consent mechanisms presents substantial legal and reputational risks. Email infrastructure lacks essential authentication measures, increasing the risk of phishing and domain spoofing. DNS health is moderate but can be improved to further protect against DNS-based attacks. The failure in NIS2 analysis indicates potential non-compliance with European cybersecurity directives, which may have regulatory consequences. Immediate remediation is required to mitigate risks related to data breaches, legal penalties, and customer trust erosion.

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with no critical issues detected, but several high and medium-risk vulnerabilities primarily related to missing security headers and GDPR compliance gaps. The absence of essential HTTP security headers such as Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and Content-Security-Policy significantly weakens the site’s defense against common web attacks like clickjacking, content injection, and protocol downgrade attacks. GDPR compliance is inadequate, notably lacking a cookie policy and consent mechanism, exposing the business to potential regulatory penalties and reputational damage. DNS security is fairly robust, though enabling DNSSEC would further harden domain integrity. SSL/TLS and email security configurations are strong, reflecting good implementation of encryption and anti-spoofing controls. Overall, the site is secure from critical threats but requires urgent attention to privacy and HTTP header configurations to mitigate medium and high-level risks. Addressing these will enhance user trust, regulatory compliance, and protect business assets from exploitation.

The website demonstrates a generally strong security posture with no critical issues detected and high scores in SSL/TLS and network security modules. However, there is a significant concern regarding a potential subdomain takeover, which poses a high risk of unauthorized access or service disruption. Medium-level issues related to missing Permissions-Policy headers, lack of DNSSEC, insufficient email security enforcement (DMARC), and failure in GDPR and NIS2 compliance analyses highlight areas needing urgent attention to protect sensitive data and maintain regulatory compliance. Low-level issues such as missing Referrer-Policy headers and sensitive data caching increase exposure to data leakage. Addressing these vulnerabilities will reduce business risk, improve customer trust, and enhance regulatory alignment. Overall, the site is secure but requires prioritized remediation to prevent exploitation and compliance penalties. Investment in DNS security and email authentication will yield significant risk reduction. The company should also validate compliance efforts for GDPR and NIS2 to avoid legal repercussions and reputational damage.

Related:cielo.com.br

This website has 8 security issue(s) identified for improvement. Overall security score: 50/100 (unknown risk level). A comprehensive security review is recommended.

The website demonstrates a solid foundation in network security, SSL/TLS configuration, and email security, scoring 100/100 in these critical areas. However, significant gaps exist in the implementation of security headers, with a notably low score of 20/100, exposing the site to risks such as clickjacking, content injection, and cross-site scripting attacks. Missing key headers like Strict-Transport-Security and Content-Security-Policy increase vulnerability to man-in-the-middle attacks and code injection. Additionally, the failure to meet GDPR and NIS2 compliance requirements introduces legal and regulatory risks that could impact business operations and reputation. DNS security is moderately strong but can be improved by enabling DNSSEC and configuring CAA records to prevent certificate mis-issuance. Overall, while core protections are in place, addressing these header and compliance issues is critical to safeguard customer data, maintain trust, and avoid regulatory penalties.

This website has 2 high-priority security issue(s) that should be addressed promptly. Overall security score: 50/100 (unknown risk level). A comprehensive security review is recommended.

This website has 2 high-priority security issue(s) that should be addressed promptly. Overall security score: 50/100 (unknown risk level). A comprehensive security review is recommended.

The website demonstrates a generally strong security posture in network security and SSL/TLS configurations, minimizing exposure to common network-level attacks. However, significant gaps exist in GDPR compliance, primarily the absence of a cookie policy and consent banner, which pose legal and reputational risks. The lack of proper security headers and DNSSEC configuration further weakens the site against web-based and DNS-related attacks. Email security is adequate but could be enhanced with DKIM implementation to improve email authenticity and reduce phishing risks. Addressing these issues will not only improve legal compliance but also strengthen customer trust and reduce potential vulnerabilities. Overall, the site is secure in core infrastructure but requires urgent attention to privacy regulations and web security best practices to mitigate business risk.

This website has 1 high-priority security issue(s) that should be addressed promptly. Overall security score: 50/100 (unknown risk level). A comprehensive security review is recommended.

The website demonstrates a strong overall security posture with no critical or high-level issues detected. Key strengths include excellent email security, SSL/TLS configurations, and network security, all scoring 100 out of 100. However, medium-severity findings related to missing security headers, GDPR compliance gaps, NIS2 directive alignment, and DNS security weaknesses indicate areas that require attention. The absence of DNSSEC and incomplete DNS CAA record configuration slightly reduce DNS health scores and expose the domain to potential spoofing or unauthorized certificate issuance risks. Addressing these medium-level issues will not only improve security resilience but also enhance regulatory compliance and trust with customers and partners. The low-severity issues currently pose minimal risk but should be monitored as part of ongoing security hygiene. Overall, prioritizing remediation in security headers and regulatory compliance will deliver the greatest business benefit and risk reduction.

The website demonstrates a generally solid technical security foundation with strong SSL/TLS configurations and good network security posture. However, significant gaps exist in organizational security governance and compliance, particularly relating to NIS2 directive requirements and GDPR adherence. The absence of a formal information security framework, security policies, incident response procedures, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms exposes the business to increased regulatory risk and potential operational disruptions. Email security measures are mostly effective but lack strict DMARC enforcement, posing a risk of phishing and spoofing attacks. DNS health is adequate but can be improved by enabling DNSSEC and configuring CAA records to prevent certificate mis-issuance. Addressing these governance, policy, and compliance shortcomings will reduce regulatory liabilities, improve incident preparedness, and enhance overall trustworthiness. Immediate focus on NIS2 compliance is critical due to its high severity issues and potential legal implications. Strengthening security headers and GDPR compliance will further harden the security posture and support data protection obligations.

The website's overall security posture reveals significant gaps, particularly in compliance with NIS2 requirements and SSL/TLS configurations, which present substantial business risks. No critical vulnerabilities were found, but multiple high and medium severity issues indicate inadequate security governance and exposure to potential attacks. The absence of a documented security framework, incident response procedures, and security policy documentation severely limits the organization's ability to manage and respond to threats effectively. SSL certificates nearing expiration and weak cryptographic keys increase the risk of data interception and loss of customer trust. Exposure of high-risk services like NetBIOS and RDP on the network further elevates the threat landscape by providing potential entry points for attackers. GDPR compliance failures and missing security headers may result in regulatory penalties and reduce overall website security. While email security and DNS health show moderate strength, improvements are needed to close existing gaps. Immediate attention to these areas will help mitigate risks, comply with regulations, and protect business continuity.

The website demonstrates a generally solid security foundation with perfect scores in SSL/TLS and network security, indicating strong encryption and network controls. However, critical vulnerabilities exist in email security, notably the complete lack of email authentication mechanisms, exposing the business to risks such as email spoofing and phishing attacks. Medium-level issues with missing security headers, GDPR compliance gaps, and NIS2 directive adherence highlight regulatory and operational risks. DNS health is moderately good but lacks DNSSEC and CAA records, which could leave DNS queries vulnerable to tampering. Overall, while network and transport layers are well protected, deficiencies in email authentication, compliance, and header security could lead to reputational damage, legal penalties, and increased attack surface. Immediate remediation of email authentication and compliance issues should be prioritized to mitigate these risks. Strengthening DNS security and implementing security headers will further enhance the website’s resilience to cyber threats and regulatory scrutiny.

This website has 9 security issue(s) identified for improvement. Overall security score: 50/100 (unknown risk level). A comprehensive security review is recommended.

Related:thg.com

This website has 7 security issue(s) identified for improvement. Overall security score: 50/100 (unknown risk level). A comprehensive security review is recommended.

Related:adyen.comklarna.com

This website has 8 security issue(s) identified for improvement. Overall security score: 50/100 (unknown risk level). A comprehensive security review is recommended.

Related:adyen.comklarna.com

This website has 8 security issue(s) identified for improvement. Overall security score: 50/100 (unknown risk level). A comprehensive security review is recommended.

Related:adyen.comklarna.com

The website's overall security posture exhibits significant vulnerabilities that pose considerable business risks. Critical DNS health issues, including DNS resolution failures and missing name servers, threaten the website's availability and accessibility, directly impacting customer trust and revenue. Additionally, the absence of email authentication mechanisms such as DKIM and other configurations exposes the business to email spoofing, phishing attacks, and potential brand damage. Compliance failures related to GDPR and NIS2 further increase legal and regulatory risk. Security headers are inadequately configured, weakening defenses against common web-based attacks. While SSL/TLS implementation is strong, the network security scan highlights moderate risks that require attention. Immediate remediation of critical DNS and email security issues should be prioritized to ensure operational continuity and protect customer data.

Related:leonteq.comswissquote.ch

This website has 3 critical security issue(s) requiring immediate attention. Overall security score: 50/100 (unknown risk level). A comprehensive security review is recommended.

Related:stripe.com

The website demonstrates a strong overall security posture with no critical or high-severity issues detected and perfect scores in email security, SSL/TLS, and network security modules. However, medium-level issues related to missing or misconfigured security headers, incomplete GDPR compliance, lack of NIS2 adherence, and absence of DNSSEC indicate gaps that could expose the business to regulatory risks and potential attack vectors. Low-severity DNS configuration gaps like missing CAA records represent additional opportunities to strengthen domain security. While these medium and low findings do not pose immediate threats, addressing them proactively will reduce the risk of data breaches, regulatory penalties, and reputational damage. The DNS health score of 85/100 reflects room for improvement in domain validation and protection mechanisms. Overall, the site is well-secured but requires targeted enhancements to elevate regulatory compliance and DNS-based defenses to industry best practices.

Related:fnac.comworldline.com

The website's overall security posture is concerning due to multiple critical vulnerabilities primarily related to DNS health and email authentication. Critical issues such as DNS resolution failure, absence of name servers, and domain registration problems threaten website availability and domain ownership integrity, posing a significant risk of downtime or domain hijacking. The lack of configured email authentication mechanisms, including missing DKIM records and other authentication protocols, exposes the business to email spoofing and phishing attacks, potentially damaging brand reputation. Medium-level issues around GDPR and NIS2 compliance indicate regulatory risks that could lead to legal penalties. The absence of security headers also weakens defense against common web attacks. Although SSL/TLS configuration is strong, and network security scores are relatively good, urgent remediation is required to address foundational DNS and email security flaws. Failure to act promptly could result in service disruption, regulatory fines, and reputational damage. Strengthening these areas will enhance overall resilience and trustworthiness of the online presence.

Related:camparigroup.comadyen.com

This website has 1 critical security issue(s) requiring immediate attention. Overall security score: 50/100 (unknown risk level). A comprehensive security review is recommended.

Related:camparigroup.comadyen.com

The website's security posture is currently at high risk due to multiple critical vulnerabilities, particularly in DNS configuration and email authentication. Critical DNS issues including resolution failures, missing name servers, and domain registration problems jeopardize website availability and trustworthiness. The absence of email authentication mechanisms like DKIM severely increases the risk of phishing and email spoofing, threatening brand reputation and customer trust. Medium-level failures in security headers, GDPR compliance, and NIS2 adherence indicate gaps in regulatory compliance and baseline security controls. While SSL/TLS implementation is strong, other key areas such as DNSSEC and network security require enhancement. Overall, the site faces significant operational and compliance risks that could lead to service disruption, legal penalties, and reputational damage if not promptly addressed. Immediate remediation of critical DNS and email security issues should be the top priority. Strengthening security headers and ensuring compliance with GDPR and NIS2 will further solidify the organization's security framework.

Related:camparigroup.comadyen.com

The website exhibits significant security weaknesses with three critical issues impacting core infrastructure components such as DNS and email authentication. These critical failures pose immediate risks including domain hijacking, email spoofing, and service unavailability, which can severely damage business reputation and customer trust. Medium-level failures in GDPR and NIS2 compliance highlight regulatory risks that could lead to legal penalties and fines. The absence of key security headers and incomplete email security configurations further weaken defenses against common attack vectors. While SSL/TLS implementation is strong, the overall security posture is undermined by foundational issues in DNS and email systems. Network security is moderately robust but requires further validation due to a failed network scan. Immediate remediation is necessary to secure domain registration, DNS resolution, and email authentication to protect business operations and data integrity. Failure to address these issues promptly may result in service disruptions, data breaches, and compliance violations.

Related:airpartner.com

The website demonstrates a generally strong security posture with no critical or high-severity issues detected. SSL/TLS and network security configurations are robust, scoring a perfect 100, ensuring encrypted and secure communications. However, medium-level concerns exist around compliance and security best practices, including missing security headers, lack of DKIM email authentication, and absence of DNSSEC. Additionally, the site has not fully met GDPR and NIS2 regulatory requirements, which could expose the business to compliance risks and potential legal penalties. The absence of DNSSEC increases the risk of DNS spoofing attacks, potentially leading to traffic interception or redirection. While low-severity issues like missing CAA records are less urgent, addressing them will further harden the DNS infrastructure. Overall, the business should prioritize remediation of medium-level issues to reduce exposure and maintain customer trust in a regulated environment.

Related:airpartner.com

The website's security assessment reveals significant vulnerabilities that pose serious risks to business operations and reputation. Critical issues with DNS health, including DNS resolution failure, missing name servers, and domain registration problems, threaten website availability and trust. Email security is notably weak, lacking essential authentication mechanisms like DKIM, exposing the business to phishing and spoofing attacks. Compliance-related areas like GDPR and NIS2 have failed analysis, indicating potential regulatory and legal risks. While SSL/TLS configuration is strong, the absence of key security headers and incomplete network security scans further weaken the overall security posture. Immediate remediation is crucial to protect customer data, maintain service continuity, and uphold regulatory compliance. The current state could impact customer trust, search engine ranking, and increase susceptibility to cyberattacks. Addressing these issues will safeguard business continuity and enhance stakeholder confidence.

The website's security posture is currently at significant risk due to several critical and high-severity issues primarily related to DNS configuration and email authentication. Critical failures in DNS resolution and domain registration pose immediate threats to website availability and brand reputation, potentially exposing the business to downtime and phishing attacks. The absence of email authentication mechanisms like DKIM and other configurations increases the risk of email spoofing and phishing, which can damage customer trust and lead to regulatory penalties. Medium-level issues such as missing security headers and failure to meet GDPR and NIS2 compliance standards further expose the organization to data protection risks and potential legal consequences. While SSL/TLS implementation is robust, the lack of DNSSEC and other DNS security measures weakens the overall integrity of domain communications. Network security appears relatively strong but requires attention due to an incomplete network scan. Immediate remediation is essential to stabilize foundational security components and protect business operations and customer data. Prioritizing DNS health and email security improvements will yield the highest impact on reducing risk and ensuring compliance.

The website demonstrates a generally sound security posture with no critical vulnerabilities; however, there are several medium and one high-risk issues that require immediate attention. The absence of a DMARC record poses a significant risk to the organization's email security, increasing susceptibility to phishing and spoofing attacks. Medium-level deficiencies such as missing DKIM records, lack of security headers, and disabled HSTS reduce protection against common web-based threats and data interception. Additionally, failure to enable DNSSEC and configure CAA records exposes DNS infrastructure to manipulation risks. Compliance-related gaps including failed GDPR and NIS2 analyses highlight potential regulatory and legal exposure. The strong network security posture is a positive indicator but does not mitigate risks introduced by the highlighted configuration weaknesses. Addressing these issues will reinforce defense-in-depth and enhance trust with customers and partners. Proactive remediation will also reduce potential regulatory penalties and safeguard brand reputation.

Related:ey.com

The website demonstrates a generally strong security posture with no critical or high severity issues detected, and perfect scores in SSL/TLS and network security modules. However, several medium-level findings indicate gaps in compliance and security best practices, particularly around security headers, GDPR, NIS2 compliance, email authentication, and DNS configurations. The absence of DKIM records and missing DNSSEC implementation exposes the domain to email spoofing and DNS-related attacks, respectively. Failure in security headers analysis suggests potential risks related to browser-based attacks such as clickjacking or XSS. GDPR and NIS2 analysis failures highlight compliance risks that could lead to regulatory penalties and impact customer trust. Addressing these medium-level issues will improve both security resilience and regulatory alignment, thereby protecting business reputation and reducing risk exposure.

Related:bouygues.comcolas.com

The website's overall security posture shows serious vulnerabilities primarily in its DNS infrastructure and compliance frameworks. While email security and SSL/TLS configurations are robust, critical DNS issues such as resolution failures and domain registration problems pose immediate operational and reputational risks. The failure to implement essential security headers and compliance with GDPR and NIS2 regulations exposes the business to potential data breaches and regulatory penalties. Medium-level concerns in network security and missing DNS security extensions further increase the attack surface. Addressing these issues promptly is vital to ensure business continuity, protect customer data, and maintain regulatory compliance. Without remediation, the organization risks service outages, data compromise, and loss of customer trust. Prioritizing DNS health and compliance will substantially improve the overall security posture. A holistic security strategy integrating technical fixes and compliance measures is recommended.