Security Directory

U

United Internet for Unicef Stiftung

united-internet-for-unicef-stiftung.com

71

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with no critical vulnerabilities detected, but several high and medium-risk issues remain unaddressed. The strongest areas are network security and SSL/TLS configurations, with near-optimal scores. However, significant gaps exist in compliance with GDPR and NIS2 regulatory requirements, including missing cookie policies, consent mechanisms, and absence of formal security and incident response documentation. Security headers are inconsistently implemented, leaving the site vulnerable to clickjacking and some cross-site scripting risks. Email security and DNS configurations are generally good but could be strengthened further. Failure to address these issues exposes the business to regulatory penalties, reputational damage, and increased risk of cyber incidents. Prioritizing compliance and security policy development will mitigate legal and operational risks while improving overall resilience.

V

Virgin Media O2

virginmediao2.co.uk

67

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with no critical vulnerabilities but several high and medium severity issues that pose significant business risks. Key concerns include missing essential security headers, lack of GDPR compliance mechanisms such as cookie policies and consent banners, and absence of foundational NIS2 security governance like incident response and security policy documentation. These gaps increase exposure to web-based attacks, regulatory fines, and operational disruptions. While network security and SSL/TLS configurations are strong, DNS and email security require improvements to prevent spoofing and phishing risks. The low scores in GDPR and NIS2 compliance highlight urgent needs to align with legal and regulatory frameworks to avoid penalties and reputational damage. Addressing these issues promptly will strengthen trust, reduce liability, and protect business continuity.

S

STIFTUNG UNITED INTERNET FOR UNICEF

united-internet-for-unicef-stiftung.de

66

The website's overall security posture reveals significant compliance and security gaps, particularly in privacy and regulatory adherence, with a critical GDPR issue indicating non-compliance for an EU business. While foundational network and SSL/TLS security controls are strong, key security headers are missing, exposing the website to clickjacking and cross-site scripting risks. There is a notable absence of documented information security policies, incident response plans, and vulnerability disclosure processes, which hinders effective security governance and response. Email security is relatively well managed, but lack of DKIM records could impact email deliverability and phishing protection. DNS security measures are decent but could be improved by enabling DNSSEC and configuring CAA records. Overall, the most pressing risks are regulatory non-compliance and missing security governance frameworks, which could lead to legal penalties, reputational damage, and operational disruptions. Immediate attention to privacy policies, cookie management, and security documentation is essential to align with GDPR and NIS2 requirements.

T

Telefonica UK Limited

o2.com

70

The website's overall security posture shows no critical issues but reveals significant gaps in key areas such as security headers, GDPR compliance, and NIS2 regulatory adherence. High severity issues include missing essential HTTP headers that protect against common web attacks, absence of a cookie consent banner, and a lack of fundamental information security and incident response policies. While email security, SSL/TLS, DNS health, and network security are relatively strong, the deficiencies in governance and compliance expose the business to legal risks, regulatory penalties, and increased vulnerability to cyber threats. The low security header score (35/100) and poor NIS2 compliance (25/100) highlight urgent needs for improvement. Addressing these gaps will not only enhance protection against exploitation but also strengthen customer trust and regulatory standing. Prioritizing policy documentation and technical controls will reduce risk exposure and support business continuity. Overall, the assessment indicates a pressing requirement to integrate security best practices with compliance frameworks to safeguard business operations effectively.

T

Telefónica Germany GmbH & Co. OHG

o2business.de

50

The website's security posture is currently poor, with critical vulnerabilities and compliance gaps that expose the business to significant legal, operational, and reputational risks. Key deficiencies in GDPR compliance, including missing cookie policies and consent mechanisms, put the organization at risk of regulatory penalties within the EU. Network security is severely compromised by the exposure of multiple critical and high-risk services such as SMB, Telnet, MSSQL, and MongoDB, which are common vectors for cyberattacks and data breaches. The absence of fundamental security policies, incident response procedures, and vulnerability disclosure frameworks further exacerbates this risk. Security headers and email authentication protocols are inadequately implemented, increasing the risk of web-based attacks and email spoofing. Although DNS health scores relatively well, SSL/TLS weaknesses and expiring certificates undermine secure communications. Immediate remediation is essential to protect sensitive data, maintain customer trust, and ensure business continuity. Without swift action, the organization faces heightened chances of cyber incidents and regulatory enforcement actions.

X

Xodo

xodo.com

79

The website demonstrates a generally strong security posture in areas such as email security, SSL/TLS configuration, and network security, all scoring 100/100. However, critical gaps exist in compliance with GDPR and NIS2 regulations, with the NIS2 module scoring particularly low at 25/100, indicating insufficient governance and incident management frameworks. Missing key security headers and cookie consent mechanisms expose the site to client-side vulnerabilities and regulatory risks. The absence of documented security policies, incident response procedures, and vulnerability disclosure processes could lead to unmanaged security incidents and reputational damage. DNS security is moderately strong but can be improved by enabling DNSSEC and configuring CAA records. Overall, the site is operationally secure but requires urgent attention to governance, compliance, and security process maturity to mitigate legal and operational risks. Addressing these issues will enhance customer trust, legal compliance, and resilience against cyber threats.

A

Apryse

apryse.com

68

The website demonstrates a generally strong network and SSL/TLS security posture, scoring 100/100 in these areas, which reduces risk from external network threats and ensures secure data transmission. However, significant deficiencies exist in GDPR compliance and NIS2 security governance, with scores of 25/100 in both, indicating major regulatory and operational risks. High-severity issues such as missing privacy and cookie policies, lack of cookie consent mechanisms, and absence of incident response and security policy documentation expose the business to legal penalties and potential operational disruptions. Security headers are partially implemented but require strengthening to prevent common web-based attacks like clickjacking and MIME-type sniffing. Email security is relatively strong but requires improvements in DMARC enforcement to prevent phishing attacks. Immediate attention to regulatory compliance and formalizing security governance will mitigate legal exposure and enhance incident resilience. Overall, the website is vulnerable to compliance violations and operational risks despite good technical network defenses.

A

Apryse

pdfjs.express

56

The website's overall security posture is weak, with significant gaps in foundational security controls and regulatory compliance. Critical issues in email authentication pose severe risks of phishing and domain spoofing, potentially damaging brand reputation and customer trust. Missing key security headers expose the site to common web-based attacks such as clickjacking and cross-site scripting. GDPR non-compliance, including absence of privacy and cookie policies, risks regulatory penalties and undermines customer data protection assurances. The lack of an information security framework, incident response, and business continuity planning indicates poor operational resilience and readiness to handle security incidents. While network security and SSL/TLS configurations are relatively strong, critical gaps such as missing HSTS and DNSSEC reduce overall trustworthiness and increase vulnerability to man-in-the-middle attacks. Immediate remediation is necessary to protect customer data, meet regulatory requirements, and safeguard business reputation. Without swift action, the business faces elevated risk of data breaches, regulatory fines, and loss of customer confidence.

The website demonstrates a generally strong security posture with no critical or high severity issues detected, reflecting solid foundational controls in place. Key strengths include perfect scores in SSL/TLS implementation and network security, indicating robust encryption and resilient infrastructure. However, several medium-level concerns related to security headers, GDPR compliance, NIS2 directives, email authentication, and DNS security require attention to mitigate potential risks. The absence of DKIM records and DNSSEC increases susceptibility to email spoofing and DNS-based attacks, which could impact brand reputation and regulatory compliance. Additionally, failure in security headers and GDPR/NIS2 assessments suggests gaps in policy enforcement and data protection measures. Low severity issues such as missing CAA records, though less urgent, should still be addressed to enhance overall domain security. Addressing these areas will improve regulatory compliance, reduce attack surfaces, and strengthen trust with customers and partners.

P

PayU

payu.in

73

The website demonstrates a generally stable security posture with no critical vulnerabilities detected. However, significant gaps exist in compliance and governance areas, particularly around GDPR and NIS2 regulations, which expose the business to legal and operational risks. Missing key security headers and inadequate privacy practices indicate a potential for increased susceptibility to common web attacks and regulatory penalties. Email and network security are strong points, suggesting effective perimeter defenses and communication controls. The absence of documented security policies, incident response plans, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms further heightens the risk of prolonged breaches and reputational damage. Improvements in DNS security and SSL/TLS configurations will enhance trust and reduce attack surface. Overall, while technical defenses are reasonably solid, urgent attention to governance and compliance frameworks is critical to safeguard the business and maintain regulatory alignment.

C

Cleartrip

cleartrip.ae

67

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with no critical vulnerabilities but multiple high and medium risks predominantly related to policy, compliance, and configuration gaps. Key deficiencies exist in compliance with GDPR and NIS2 regulations, including the absence of privacy and cookie policies, consent mechanisms, and formal security frameworks or incident response procedures. Missing security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Content-Type-Options increase the risk of client-side attacks like XSS and MIME sniffing. While the network security and SSL/TLS configurations are generally strong, several foundational controls including email authentication (DKIM), DNSSEC, and security documentation are lacking or insufficient. These gaps expose the business to regulatory fines, reputational damage, and potential operational disruption. Immediate remediation will improve legal compliance, reduce attack surface, and build stakeholder trust. Establishing formal security governance and transparency will be crucial for long-term resilience and regulatory adherence. Overall, the organization should prioritize closing compliance and configuration deficiencies to strengthen its cybersecurity maturity and protect customer data effectively.

C

Cleartrip

cleartrip.com

70

The website demonstrates a strong foundation in core network, email, and SSL/TLS security, evidenced by high scores in these areas. However, significant gaps exist in web security headers, GDPR compliance, and adherence to NIS2 security standards, exposing the business to regulatory risks and potential reputational damage. Critical privacy policies and user consent mechanisms are missing, which can lead to non-compliance fines and loss of customer trust. The absence of an incident response plan and security policy documentation further increases operational risk in the event of a security breach. Additionally, missing key HTTP security headers weakens defenses against common web-based attacks. While DNS security is generally healthy, the lack of DNSSEC implementation leaves potential vulnerabilities unmitigated. Overall, the website requires urgent attention to governance, compliance, and web security controls to minimize legal, financial, and operational risks.

I

IndiaIdeas.com Limited (BillDesk)

billdesk.com

75

The website demonstrates a generally solid technical security foundation with strong email security, SSL/TLS configurations, and network security posture. However, significant gaps exist in compliance with GDPR and NIS2 regulatory frameworks, with multiple high-severity issues such as missing privacy and cookie policies, absence of consent mechanisms, and lack of formal security and incident response documentation. These gaps expose the business to legal, reputational, and operational risks, including potential regulatory fines and loss of customer trust. Security headers are moderately configured but require improvements to enhance browser security controls. DNS security is adequate but could be strengthened by enabling DNSSEC and configuring CAA records. Prioritizing compliance and governance-related issues will align security efforts with business risk management and regulatory requirements. Addressing these deficiencies will create a more resilient security posture and support sustainable business operations.

I

IMDb.com, Inc.

boxofficemojo.com

68

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with no critical issues found but several high and medium severity vulnerabilities that require immediate attention. Key weaknesses lie in missing essential HTTP security headers, lack of GDPR compliance measures, and inadequate adherence to NIS2 security frameworks. These gaps expose the business to risks such as clickjacking, cross-site scripting, regulatory non-compliance, and operational disruption due to lack of incident response and security policies. On a positive note, email security, SSL/TLS configuration, DNS health, and network security show strong performance, reducing exposure to common attack vectors. However, the absence of cookie consent mechanisms and security documentation significantly increases legal and operational risks. Addressing these issues promptly will improve customer trust, regulatory compliance, and overall resilience against cyber threats. Prioritizing governance and policy-based controls alongside technical fixes is critical for sustainable security posture enhancement.

P

Paytm

paytmwallet.com

65

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with no critical vulnerabilities detected, but it faces significant risks in compliance and information security governance. High-priority issues include missing essential headers that protect against clickjacking and cross-site scripting, as well as the absence of GDPR-required documentation such as Privacy and Cookie Policies and consent mechanisms. Furthermore, the site lacks foundational NIS2-aligned security policies and incident response processes, exposing the business to regulatory and operational risks. While email security, SSL/TLS, DNS health, and network security show reasonably strong scores, several medium-level weaknesses like expiring SSL certificates and missing vulnerability disclosure policies remain. The overall compliance score is low, indicating urgent need for attention to privacy and security governance. Addressing these gaps will reduce legal exposure, improve customer trust, and enhance defense against cyber threats.

The website demonstrates a generally strong security posture with no critical or high-level issues detected, reflecting effective baseline protections. Key strengths include excellent email security, SSL/TLS configuration, and robust network security. However, medium-level issues related to missing or misconfigured security headers, GDPR compliance, NIS2 regulatory alignment, and DNS health (notably the absence of DNSSEC) present moderate risks. These gaps could expose the organization to data privacy challenges, regulatory non-compliance, and potential DNS-based attacks. Low-risk findings such as missing CAA records are minor but should be addressed to maintain defense-in-depth. Overall, while the infrastructure is solid, addressing medium-level concerns will enhance compliance, resilience, and customer trust. Proactive remediation of these areas will safeguard the business and support evolving regulatory requirements.

The website exhibits a generally strong security posture, with no critical or high severity issues detected. Key areas such as SSL/TLS and email security are fully compliant, scoring 100/100, ensuring encrypted communication and secure email handling. Network security also demonstrates robust controls. However, there are four medium-level concerns primarily related to missing or inadequate security headers, GDPR compliance, NIS2 regulatory alignment, and DNSSEC absence. These gaps may expose the business to regulatory risks, data protection vulnerabilities, and potential DNS-based attacks. Addressing these medium issues proactively will help mitigate risks, maintain customer trust, and ensure compliance with evolving cybersecurity standards. Overall, the website is secure but requires targeted improvements to strengthen defenses and regulatory adherence.

A

Audible

audible.in

67

The website demonstrates a generally strong technical security foundation in areas such as SSL/TLS, network security, and email security, which reduces exposure to common external threats. However, significant gaps exist in security headers implementation and data privacy compliance, with critical omissions like missing Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options headers that increase vulnerability to web-based attacks. The lack of GDPR compliance elements including privacy and cookie policies, consent banners, and third-party privacy disclosures poses legal and reputational risks, especially for customers in regulated regions. Additionally, the absence of a formal information security framework, incident response procedures, and security policy documentation indicates immature internal governance, which could delay threat detection and response. Medium-impact gaps in DNS security and DKIM configuration suggest room for improvement in email and domain protections. Overall, the security posture reflects a need to prioritize privacy compliance and internal security governance to mitigate business risk and maintain customer trust. Immediate remediation of high-severity issues will significantly enhance the website’s resilience against both regulatory and cyber threats.

A

AbeBooks

abebooks.com

71

The website demonstrates a generally stable security posture with no critical vulnerabilities detected; however, several high and medium-risk issues indicate significant gaps in compliance and information security management. Notably, the absence of a Content Security Policy and incomplete GDPR adherence expose the business to data privacy risks and potential regulatory penalties. The lack of documented security policies, incident response procedures, and vulnerability disclosure protocols highlights weaknesses in organizational security governance. While network security and email security are relatively strong, weaknesses in SSL/TLS configuration and DNS settings present opportunities for exploitation. These deficiencies collectively increase the risk of data breaches, reputational damage, and legal non-compliance, which can have severe business impacts. Addressing these issues promptly will enhance customer trust, regulatory compliance, and overall resilience against cyber threats. Prioritizing governance and compliance-related shortcomings alongside technical controls will deliver the greatest business value. Continuous monitoring and improvement are recommended to maintain and advance security standards.

P

PhonePe

phonepe.com

73

The website exhibits a mixed security posture with no critical vulnerabilities but several high and medium-risk issues that could expose the business to legal, reputational, and operational risks. Key weaknesses are concentrated in GDPR compliance and NIS2 regulatory adherence, indicating gaps in privacy management and information security governance. Missing cookie policies and consent mechanisms risk non-compliance with data protection laws, potentially resulting in fines and customer trust erosion. Additionally, the absence of documented security policies, incident response procedures, and vulnerability disclosure policies undermines the organization's ability to manage and respond to security incidents effectively. Security headers are partially implemented but require strengthening to prevent common web attacks. While email security, SSL/TLS, DNS health, and network security show strong scores, the SSL certificate’s impending expiry and lack of DNSSEC present medium risks. Overall, the website needs focused improvements in regulatory compliance and security governance to safeguard business continuity and customer trust.

A

Airtel

airtel.in

69

The website exhibits a moderate security posture with no critical issues but several high and medium-level vulnerabilities primarily related to security headers, GDPR compliance, and NIS2 regulatory requirements. While foundational network security and SSL/TLS configurations are strong, significant gaps exist in privacy policies, incident response, and security governance frameworks. The absence of key HTTP security headers, such as Content-Security-Policy, increases the risk of cross-site scripting and data injection attacks. Non-compliance with GDPR due to missing privacy and cookie policies, as well as consent mechanisms, exposes the business to legal and reputational risks. Furthermore, the lack of documented security policies, incident response plans, and vulnerability disclosure processes undermines the organization's readiness to handle security incidents and regulatory audits. Email security and DNS configurations are generally solid but can be improved to enhance overall trustworthiness. Addressing these gaps will reduce legal exposure, improve customer trust, and strengthen the organization’s cybersecurity resilience.

F

Flipkart

flipkart.com

95

The website's overall security posture is solid, with no critical or high-severity issues detected, indicating a generally secure environment. The site excels in SSL/TLS implementation and network security, scoring a perfect 100 in both areas, which ensures encrypted and reliable communications. However, medium-level concerns remain around missing or misconfigured security headers, lack of DNSSEC implementation, and failures in GDPR and NIS2 compliance assessments. These gaps could expose the business to data protection risks, regulatory non-compliance penalties, and potential DNS-based attacks. Low-level issues like a complex SPF record and missing CAA records suggest room for improvement in email and DNS trustworthiness. Addressing these medium and low issues will strengthen defenses, reduce risk exposure, and enhance customer trust. Proactively resolving compliance and security header failures is crucial to maintaining regulatory adherence and protecting brand reputation.

N

NDTV Profit

ndtvprofit.com

60

The website exhibits significant security and compliance weaknesses that could expose the business to data breaches, regulatory penalties, and reputational damage. Critical gaps exist in email authentication, exposing the organization to email spoofing and phishing attacks. Missing and weak security headers increase the risk of web-based attacks such as clickjacking and cross-site scripting. GDPR compliance issues around cookie policies and privacy notices raise legal and customer trust concerns. The absence of a security framework, incident response, and business continuity planning indicates immature security governance, increasing operational risk. While SSL/TLS configuration is relatively strong, certificate expiry and incomplete HSTS settings need attention. DNS and email infrastructure show high-risk misconfigurations that may impact email deliverability and security. Overall, the current posture demands urgent remediation to protect assets and maintain regulatory compliance.

N

NDTV Profit

bloombergquint.com

67

The website exhibits a moderate security posture with no critical vulnerabilities but several high and medium-risk issues that could expose the business to compliance risks and operational disruptions. Key areas of concern include missing security headers that increase susceptibility to clickjacking and content injection attacks, and significant GDPR compliance gaps such as the absence of cookie policies and consent mechanisms. The NIS2-related deficiencies, notably the lack of incident response procedures and security documentation, place the organization at risk of inadequate cyber incident management and regulatory penalties. While SSL/TLS and network security measures are strong, email security and DNS configurations require improvements to reduce phishing and spoofing risks. Addressing these gaps promptly will protect customer data, enhance regulatory compliance, and reduce potential reputational damage. Overall, the security posture demands focused remediation in governance and application-level controls to align with industry best practices and legal requirements.

The website demonstrates a solid technical security foundation with strong network security and security headers, and generally good SSL/TLS and DNS health. However, significant gaps exist in compliance with GDPR and NIS2 regulatory frameworks, exposing the business to legal, operational, and reputational risks. The absence of a cookie policy, consent banner, and comprehensive privacy policy undermines user trust and violates privacy regulations. Critical NIS2 shortcomings, including missing information security framework, security policies, incident response procedures, and security contact information, leave the organization vulnerable to cyber incidents and regulatory penalties. Email security is moderate but requires improvement to prevent phishing and spoofing attacks. Addressing these gaps is urgent to reduce exposure to compliance fines, data breaches, and operational disruptions. Overall, while technical controls are strong, governance and compliance controls need immediate attention to ensure holistic security and regulatory adherence.

C

CoStar

costar.com

72

The website demonstrates a generally strong technical security foundation with excellent SSL/TLS and network security scores. However, there are significant concerns regarding GDPR compliance and organizational security governance, as indicated by the lack of privacy policies, cookie consent mechanisms, and documented security frameworks. Missing critical security headers, particularly the Content-Security-Policy, expose the site to web-based attacks like XSS. The absence of incident response procedures and business continuity plans under the NIS2 framework increases operational risk in case of security breaches. While email security and DNS health are solid, the lack of DNSSEC and vulnerability disclosure policies limit the overall resilience. Immediate attention is required to address compliance and governance gaps to avoid regulatory penalties and reputational damage. Strengthening these areas will improve trust with customers and partners while reducing business risk.

E

Eventive

eventive.org

65

The website demonstrates a moderate to low overall security posture with no critical vulnerabilities detected, but multiple high and medium risk issues that expose it to potential data breaches, compliance violations, and operational risks. Key weaknesses lie in missing essential security headers, lack of GDPR compliance artifacts such as privacy and cookie policies, and absence of fundamental NIS2 cybersecurity governance frameworks including incident response and security policy documentation. While network security, email security, SSL/TLS, and DNS configurations are relatively strong, significant improvements are needed in application-layer security and regulatory compliance to protect customer data and avoid legal penalties. The absence of cookie consent mechanisms and privacy policies poses substantial risks under GDPR regulations, potentially leading to fines and reputational damage. Furthermore, the missing security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options increase susceptibility to cross-site scripting and clickjacking attacks. Addressing these vulnerabilities and compliance gaps promptly will enhance customer trust, reduce exposure to cyber threats, and ensure alignment with industry standards and regulations. Prioritizing governance and policy implementations alongside technical controls is essential for a comprehensive security posture improvement.

The website demonstrates a generally strong security posture with no critical or high severity issues detected. Key areas such as email security, SSL/TLS configurations, and network security are well implemented, scoring perfect marks. However, there are medium-level concerns related to missing security headers, GDPR compliance, NIS2 readiness, and DNS health, specifically the absence of DNSSEC. These issues could expose the business to regulatory risks and increase susceptibility to certain cyber threats like DNS spoofing. Low-level issues such as missing CAA records should also be addressed to further harden DNS security. Overall, the site is secure but would benefit from targeted improvements in compliance and DNS defenses to mitigate potential vulnerabilities and regulatory penalties.

T

Treasury Intelligence Solutions GmbH

tispayments.com

72

The website demonstrates a solid network security posture and strong email security but reveals significant weaknesses in regulatory compliance and foundational security governance. High-impact issues center around GDPR non-compliance, including absence of cookie policies and consent mechanisms, risking legal penalties and reputational damage. The NIS2-related findings indicate a lack of critical policies and incident response procedures, exposing the organization to operational risks and potential regulatory sanctions. SSL/TLS configurations also present vulnerabilities with weak key lengths and impending certificate expiration that could undermine data confidentiality and user trust. Medium-level header and DNS security gaps further expose the site to exploitation opportunities. Overall, the site needs urgent attention to compliance frameworks and security policy documentation to align with legal and industry standards. Addressing these areas will reduce legal risk, enhance customer trust, and strengthen cyber resilience.

C

Consensus Sales, LLC

goconsensus.com

73

The website demonstrates a moderate overall security posture with no critical issues but several high and medium severity vulnerabilities that require urgent attention. Key gaps exist in security headers, GDPR compliance, and especially in adherence to NIS2 requirements, indicating insufficient information security governance and incident response preparedness. Missing Content-Security-Policy and Permissions-Policy headers expose the site to client-side attacks, while the absence of a cookie consent banner and incomplete privacy documentation risk regulatory non-compliance and potential fines. SSL/TLS and network security are strong areas, but upcoming certificate expiry and missing DNSSEC present risks to data integrity and trust. Email security shows room for improvement with missing DKIM signatures, which could affect email authenticity. Addressing these issues will strengthen both the technical defenses and regulatory compliance, reducing the risk of data breaches, reputational damage, and legal penalties.

C

Cliniko

cliniko.com

70

The website demonstrates a solid foundation in network security, email security, and SSL/TLS configurations, reflecting a mature stance on technical defenses. However, significant gaps exist in compliance with GDPR and NIS2 regulatory frameworks, posing legal and reputational risks. Missing privacy and cookie policies, along with absence of consent mechanisms, expose the business to potential fines and customer trust erosion. Lack of formal information security frameworks and incident response plans weakens the organization's ability to manage and mitigate security incidents effectively. Security headers are partially implemented but require strengthening to guard against common web-based attacks. DNS security can be enhanced further by enabling DNSSEC and properly configuring CAA records. Overall, while technical controls are generally strong, urgent improvements in governance, compliance, and policy documentation are critical to reduce business risk and ensure regulatory adherence.

The website demonstrates a strong security foundation with no critical or high-risk vulnerabilities detected. Core security modules such as email security, SSL/TLS, and network security score a perfect 100, indicating robust protections in these areas. However, medium-severity issues related to security headers, GDPR compliance, NIS2 requirements, and DNS configuration suggest gaps that could expose the business to regulatory risks and moderate security threats. The absence of DNSSEC and incomplete security header implementation are notable weaknesses that could impact trust and data integrity. Low-severity issues like missing CAA records further indicate areas for DNS hardening. Overall, while the current posture minimizes immediate high-risk threats, addressing these medium-level issues is essential to maintain compliance, enhance resilience, and protect business reputation in the longer term.

H

HandL Digital LLC

utmgrabber.com

71

The website demonstrates a mixed security posture with no critical vulnerabilities but several high and medium-risk issues that could expose the business to significant security and compliance risks. Key gaps in security headers and transport security headers reduce protection against common web-based attacks and data interception. Non-compliance with GDPR, notably lacking a cookie consent banner and incomplete privacy policies, risks regulatory penalties and undermines user trust. The absence of a formal information security framework, incident response procedures, and security policies indicates weak organizational security maturity, potentially leading to poor incident handling and increased downtime. While email, network security, SSL/TLS, and DNS configurations are relatively strong, critical improvements are needed in governance and application-layer protections. Addressing these vulnerabilities promptly will protect sensitive data, improve regulatory compliance, and strengthen overall cyber resilience. Prioritizing governance and security headers will provide the greatest immediate business value. Continuous monitoring and policy updates should follow to maintain security posture and compliance.

P

PayFort

payfort.com

93

The website exhibits a generally solid security foundation with no critical or high-level vulnerabilities detected, indicating a stable security posture. SSL/TLS and network security modules are fully optimized, ensuring encrypted communications and robust network defenses. However, there are medium-level concerns primarily around missing or misconfigured security headers, GDPR compliance, NIS2 regulatory adherence, and DNS security features like DNSSEC. Low-level issues include complexities in email SPF records and lack of DMARC reporting, which could affect email deliverability and phishing resilience. The absence of certain DNS configurations such as CAA records slightly increases risk exposure to unauthorized certificate issuance. Addressing these medium and low-level gaps will enhance regulatory compliance, reduce attack surface, and improve overall trustworthiness. Proactively closing these gaps will also mitigate risks related to data privacy regulations and evolving cybersecurity threats. Overall, the site is secure but requires targeted improvements to meet best practices and regulatory expectations fully.

U

Uber

uberhealth.com

72

The website's overall security posture shows strengths in network security and SSL/TLS configurations, with high scores in these areas reflecting robust technical defenses. However, significant gaps exist in compliance and governance, particularly concerning GDPR and NIS2 requirements, which pose substantial legal and operational risks. Missing privacy policies, cookie consent mechanisms, and third-party privacy assessments expose the business to regulatory penalties and reputational damage. The absence of formal information security frameworks, incident response plans, and security policies indicates a lack of preparedness for cyber incidents, increasing the risk of prolonged disruptions. Security headers and email security need improvements to enhance data protection and mitigate phishing risks. DNS health is generally solid but could be strengthened by enabling DNSSEC and configuring CAA records. Addressing these issues promptly will reduce compliance risks, improve customer trust, and enhance overall resilience against cyber threats.

S

SuperLife

superlife.co.nz

66

The website demonstrates a moderate to weak overall security posture with no critical vulnerabilities but multiple high and medium-risk issues that could expose the business to significant risks. Key gaps exist in security headers implementation, GDPR compliance, and adherence to the NIS2 cybersecurity framework, indicating potential regulatory non-compliance and increased risk of data breaches. The SSL/TLS configuration is suboptimal, with an expiring certificate posing a near-term availability risk. While network security and email security are relatively strong, foundational aspects such as incident response, security policies, and cookie management need urgent attention. The absence of critical headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options increases the risk of cross-site scripting and clickjacking attacks. GDPR-related deficiencies, including missing cookie consent and insufficient privacy policy, may lead to legal penalties and reputational damage. Immediate remediation is essential to protect customer data, ensure regulatory compliance, and maintain business continuity.

S

Smartshares Limited

smartinvest.co.nz

63

The website's overall security posture reveals significant gaps, particularly in foundational security headers, GDPR compliance, and NIS2 regulatory adherence. While there are no critical vulnerabilities, multiple high-severity issues expose the business to risks such as data breaches, regulatory penalties, and reputational damage. Missing key HTTP security headers and an impending SSL certificate expiration undermine secure communications and user trust. GDPR compliance deficiencies, including the absence of a cookie policy and consent mechanisms, present legal and operational risks, especially in European markets. The lack of documented information security and incident response policies indicates insufficient preparedness against cyber incidents. On a positive note, the network security and email security modules score relatively well, showing strengths in these areas. Immediate remediation is needed to protect sensitive data, ensure regulatory compliance, and maintain customer confidence.

A

Aramex

aramex.net

96

The website demonstrates a generally strong security posture with no critical or high-severity issues detected. Core protections such as email security, SSL/TLS implementation, and network security are fully compliant and scored at 100%. However, medium-severity gaps exist primarily around security headers, GDPR compliance, NIS2 regulation adherence, and DNS security configurations, notably the absence of DNSSEC. These weaknesses expose the site to potential risks like data privacy non-compliance, increased susceptibility to DNS spoofing attacks, and suboptimal mitigation of common web-based threats. Addressing these areas will enhance regulatory compliance, strengthen defenses against DNS-based and web application attacks, and reduce potential legal and reputational risks. The low-severity issues, such as missing CAA records, while less urgent, should be resolved to maintain comprehensive security hygiene. Overall, the site is well-protected but requires targeted improvements to ensure robust, future-proof security and regulatory alignment.

S

Spotify AB

spotifyjobs.com

60

The website demonstrates significant security gaps, particularly in foundational security headers, data privacy compliance, and incident management frameworks. While no critical vulnerabilities were found, multiple high-severity issues indicate an elevated risk exposure that could lead to data breaches, reputational damage, and regulatory penalties. GDPR compliance is notably weak, lacking essential cookie policies and consent mechanisms, which threatens legal compliance and customer trust. The absence of a formal information security framework, incident response, and security policy documentation further exacerbates operational risks. Email security is suboptimal with missing DMARC and DKIM records, increasing the risk of phishing and spoofing attacks. SSL/TLS configurations are moderately healthy but require timely renewal and enabling of HSTS to ensure encrypted communications. DNS and network security are relatively strong, providing a solid foundation on which to build. Immediate remediation of critical governance and privacy controls will significantly reduce business risk and support regulatory adherence.

A

Aramex

aramex.com

96

The website demonstrates a strong overall security posture with no critical or high severity issues, and perfect scores in email security, SSL/TLS configuration, and network security. However, medium-level concerns exist related to security headers, GDPR compliance, NIS2 directives, and DNS health, particularly the absence of DNSSEC. These medium issues could expose the business to regulatory risks, data privacy challenges, and potential domain spoofing vulnerabilities. Low-level issues, such as missing CAA records, slightly reduce DNS security but have less immediate impact. Addressing these gaps will enhance compliance, reduce attack surface, and improve trustworthiness with customers and partners. Prioritizing remediation in the context of evolving regulatory landscapes will safeguard business continuity and reputation. Overall, the website is secure but would benefit from targeted improvements in governance and DNS-related controls.

N

NZX Limited

nzx.com

65

The website demonstrates a concerning overall security posture with multiple high and medium risk issues primarily related to security headers, GDPR compliance, and NIS2 regulatory standards. While there are no critical vulnerabilities, the absence of key security headers and weak SSL/TLS configurations expose the site to common attacks like clickjacking, XSS, and data interception. GDPR compliance gaps, including missing cookie policies and consent mechanisms, pose legal and reputational risks, especially in regulated markets. The lack of documented information security frameworks, incident response procedures, and security policies further increases organizational risk and may hinder timely breach response. Positive aspects include strong network security and good email security practices, but these do not offset the critical gaps in web application and regulatory security controls. Immediate improvements are necessary to protect sensitive data, maintain customer trust, and ensure regulatory compliance. Without action, the business risks data breaches, regulatory fines, and damage to brand reputation.

S

Spotify AB

spotifyforbrands.com

65

The website demonstrates a moderate to weak security posture with no critical issues but several high and medium severity findings that could expose the business to significant risks. Key gaps include missing essential security headers, lack of GDPR compliance elements such as cookie policies and consent mechanisms, and absence of foundational NIS2 security governance documentation. Email and network security are relatively strong, but SSL/TLS configurations show weaknesses that could undermine data integrity and confidentiality. The absence of incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies increases the risk of prolonged breaches and reputational damage. Overall, the organization faces regulatory compliance risks, potential data breaches, and operational disruptions if these issues remain unaddressed. Immediate remediation will enhance customer trust, reduce legal exposure, and improve resilience against cyber threats. Prioritizing governance and technical controls will strengthen the security framework and align with industry best practices.

The website demonstrates a generally strong security posture with no critical or high-level issues identified and excellent scores in SSL/TLS and network security. However, several medium-severity vulnerabilities exist, primarily related to missing security headers, lack of GDPR and NIS2 compliance verification, absent email authentication via DKIM, and incomplete DNS security configurations such as missing DNSSEC. While low-severity issues like unconfigured CAA records are less urgent, addressing them will further strengthen defenses. The absence of key security headers and email authentication mechanisms could expose the business to data leakage, spoofing, and compliance risks, potentially impacting customer trust and regulatory standing. Overall, the site is well-protected at the network and transport layers but requires focused improvements in application-layer security and regulatory compliance. Prompt remediation of these medium issues will reduce attack surface and enhance resilience against phishing, data breaches, and legal penalties. The current posture positions the business well but leaves room for improvement in critical compliance and email security areas.

Z

Zillow, Inc.

zillowhomeloans.com

65

The website demonstrates a concerning security posture with significant gaps in fundamental protections and regulatory compliance. While there are no critical vulnerabilities detected, the presence of 11 high and multiple medium-severity issues indicates elevated risk exposure. Key deficiencies include missing essential security headers, lack of GDPR compliance elements such as privacy and cookie policies, and absence of core NIS2 security governance frameworks and incident response protocols. These lapses increase the risk of data breaches, regulatory penalties, and reputational damage. On a positive note, email security and network security configurations are robust, and SSL/TLS and DNS health are relatively strong but still require improvements. Immediate remediation is needed to address regulatory compliance and secure communication headers to reduce attack surfaces. Implementing structured security policies and response plans will enhance resilience and trust with customers and partners.

The website demonstrates a mixed security posture with strengths in network security, SSL/TLS configuration, email security, and DNS health. However, critical gaps exist in compliance with GDPR and NIS2 regulations, especially due to missing privacy policies, cookie consent mechanisms, and comprehensive security documentation. The absence of key security headers and vulnerability disclosure policies further exposes the site to preventable threats like clickjacking and content-type based attacks. These compliance and security shortcomings not only increase operational risk but could also result in regulatory penalties and damage to brand reputation. Immediate attention to privacy compliance and incident response readiness is crucial for business continuity and trust. While foundational security controls are in place, the lack of documented policies and frameworks leaves the organization vulnerable to evolving threats. Addressing these gaps will improve regulatory alignment, customer trust, and overall resilience against cyber threats.

C

Country Road

countryroad.co.nz

63

The website's overall security posture shows no critical vulnerabilities but reveals significant high and medium risks that could expose the business to compliance, operational, and reputational threats. Notably, the absence of foundational GDPR documentation and cookie consent mechanisms presents major regulatory compliance gaps, risking legal penalties and loss of customer trust. The missing core security headers and lack of an incident response framework further amplify exposure to common web-based attacks and operational disruptions. DNS and email configurations contain high-risk issues such as unregistered MX records and missing DKIM records, which could lead to email delivery problems and increased phishing risks. While network security and SSL/TLS configurations are generally strong, mixed content and incomplete HSTS policies reduce overall transport security effectiveness. Immediate remediation in governance, compliance, and core security controls is needed to safeguard customer data, ensure regulatory compliance, and maintain business continuity. Without addressing these, the business faces increased risks of data breaches, service interruptions, and regulatory fines.

The website demonstrates a generally sound network security and SSL/TLS posture, with strong email security and DNS health scores. However, significant shortcomings exist in privacy compliance and information security governance, notably lacking a privacy policy, cookie policies, and essential GDPR compliance elements. Critical NIS2 regulation adherence is absent, including no incident response plan, security policies, or business continuity planning, exposing the organization to regulatory and operational risks. Security headers are incompletely implemented, increasing the risk of common web attacks such as clickjacking and content sniffing. While there are no critical vulnerabilities identified, the high and medium issues collectively indicate a need for urgent remediation to reduce legal exposure, enhance customer trust, and safeguard against potential breaches. Addressing these gaps will improve regulatory compliance, reduce reputational risk, and strengthen the overall security posture. Prioritizing governance and compliance measures alongside technical controls is essential for sustainable business security.

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with no critical issues but several high and medium-risk findings that could expose the business to regulatory, reputational, and operational risks. Key deficiencies include missing fundamental security headers, lack of GDPR compliance measures such as privacy and cookie policies, and the absence of essential NIS2 cybersecurity governance frameworks like incident response and security policy documentation. While email security, SSL/TLS, DNS health, and network security show strong maturity, the gaps in legal compliance and governance frameworks pose significant risks for regulatory penalties and customer trust erosion. Addressing these gaps is vital to reduce legal liability, improve customer confidence, and strengthen overall cybersecurity resilience. Immediate focus on privacy policy implementation and establishing security governance will enhance compliance with evolving legal and industry standards. Proactive communication of security policies and incident response readiness will also support business continuity and reputation management. Overall, the website requires targeted improvements to bridge compliance and policy deficiencies while maintaining its strong technical security controls.

The website demonstrates a generally good foundation in network security, SSL/TLS configuration, and DNS health, reflected by high module scores in these areas. However, significant gaps exist in compliance with GDPR and NIS2 regulations, exposing the business to potential legal, reputational, and operational risks. Missing critical security headers and the absence of privacy and cookie policies indicate vulnerabilities to web-based attacks and non-compliance penalties. The lack of documented information security frameworks, incident response procedures, and vulnerability disclosure policies further increases risk exposure and reduces readiness to handle security incidents. Email security is moderately strong but requires improvements to enhance email authenticity and reduce phishing risks. Addressing these deficiencies will strengthen regulatory compliance, improve user trust, and reduce the likelihood and impact of cyber incidents. Immediate remediation of high-priority issues will also help safeguard the business’s reputation and avoid costly regulatory fines.

The website demonstrates a generally solid technical security foundation in areas such as network security, SSL/TLS configurations, and email security. However, significant gaps exist in compliance and governance frameworks, particularly related to GDPR and NIS2 requirements, which expose the business to regulatory risks and potential legal liabilities. Critical missing elements include privacy and cookie policies, consent mechanisms, and comprehensive security documentation such as incident response and business continuity plans. The absence of key HTTP security headers also leaves the website vulnerable to web-based attacks like clickjacking and cross-site scripting. While the technical controls are mostly strong, the lack of formal policies and procedures undermines overall security posture and business resilience. Immediate attention is required to align with regulatory mandates and establish clear security governance. Addressing these issues will reduce legal exposure, improve customer trust, and enhance operational readiness against cyber incidents.